“覆狱故失”新考

发布时间：2018-06-07 13:57

  本文选题：秦汉简牍 + 法律词汇　； 参考：《社会科学》2017年03期

【摘要】：《史记·六国年表》"覆狱故失"记载在新旧版本《史记》点校本中位置不一,语句较难理解。出土的秦及汉初法律文献资料可以证明"覆狱"在战国和秦朝时期具有普遍性,犯罪主观上的故意因素的法律用语经历了从"端"到"故"的变化,不同于《唐律疏议》近似于现代刑法意义上的"过失",秦汉时期的"失"表示检举犯罪、刑罚适用上的客观错误。目前所见,"失"存在故失、误失与过失三种分类。
[Abstract]:The chronology of the six Kingdoms of the Historical Records recorded in the old and the new edition of the Book of History is difficult to understand because of its different position in the new and old edition. The legal documents unearthed from Qin Dynasty and early Han Dynasty can prove that "overturning prison" was universal in the warring States and Qin dynasties, and the legal terms of the subjective and intentional factors of crime experienced the change from "end" to "reason". Different from "fault" in the sense of modern criminal law, "lost" in the Qin and Han dynasties indicated the objective error in the application of penalty and reported the crime. At present, there are three categories of "lost": old loss, false loss and fault.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学;
【分类号】：D929
，

本文编号：1991411