中国法学教育评估探究——基于主客观指标视角

发布时间：2018-06-14 06:46

本文选题：法学教育评估 + 主观指标　；参考：《中国高校社会科学》2017年06期

【摘要】：针对我国法学教育评估面临的诸多问题,业界多缺乏清晰定位与实践驱动,传统上单纯基于入学情况、科研成果发表以及就业比率高低进行的教育评估实效性严重不足。从国际通例来看,主客观指标视角下的法学教育评估是较为有效的理论模型和研究工具。一方面,通过学术声誉、雇主声誉、社会声望等主观指标可审视法学教育的声誉评价,进而可用来分析其对教育声誉提升的影响;另一方面,导入以引用率、生师比为主要内容的客观指标体系,使之与主观指标相结合,实现量与质的统一,有助于提高法学教育评估的科学性与推动作用。在当前的中国法学教育评估中,要特别注意考虑法学教育的特殊性,立足中国国情,由综合评估向立体评估延伸,在民主指标方面扩大公众参与,并与"双一流"建设有效融合。
[Abstract]:In view of many problems faced by the evaluation of legal education in China, the industry lacks clear orientation and practical drive, and the effectiveness of educational evaluation based solely on the situation of enrollment, the publication of scientific research results and the employment ratio has been seriously inadequate. From the point of view of international general rules, the evaluation of legal education from the perspective of subjective and objective indicators is an effective theoretical model and research tool. On the one hand, through subjective indicators such as academic reputation, employer reputation, social prestige and so on, we can examine the reputation evaluation of legal education, and then use it to analyze its impact on the promotion of educational reputation. The objective index system of the ratio of students to teachers, which combines the objective index with the subjective index and realizes the unification of quantity and quality, is helpful to improve the scientific and promoting function of the evaluation of law education. In the current evaluation of legal education in China, special attention should be paid to considering the particularity of legal education, based on China's national conditions, extending from comprehensive assessment to three-dimensional evaluation, and expanding public participation in democratic indicators. And with the "double-class" construction effective integration.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;北京市金杜律师事务所;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“法治评估创新及其在中国的推广应用研究”(12ZDD041)成果
【分类号】：D90-4

【相似文献】