中韩海洋渔业资源法比较研究

发布时间：2018-06-15 08:32

本文选题：海洋渔业资源 + 韩国海洋渔业资源法　；参考：《中国海洋大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：中韩两国作为传统渔业国家，十分重视对海洋渔业资源的开发，由于两国政治、经济体制及历史发展等多方面存在差异，两国针对海洋渔业资源的立法也各不相同。近年来，韩国通过不断修法，使其海洋渔业资源方面的立法逐渐成熟。然而，目前我国学者从法律层面针对韩国渔业资源法的研究成果却相对较少，尤其是近五年来，韩国陆续对相关法律进行了极其频繁的修订，目前国内的研究成果已经很难反映韩国海洋渔业资源的立法现状。为此，本文通过比较研究的方法，对韩国目前海洋渔业资源的立法进行梳理和分析，通过对比总结其中的先进立法经验为我国所借鉴，由此提出完善我国海洋渔业资源法律的建议。本文除前言和结语外，共分为三个部分。第一部分从两国实际出发，，介绍目前两国海洋渔业的发展概况。第二部分作为本文的重点，为下文的建议的提出提供了依据。首先，我国在海洋渔业资源方面的立法主要是《渔业法》，而韩国则专门制定《水产资源管理法》，同时，韩国的渔业属于水产业范畴，因而制定《水产业法》调整渔业活动，为明确本文海洋渔业资源的定义，有必要理清渔业、水产业等与本文相关的名词的含义。其次，两国在海洋渔业资源方面的法律体系截然不同，我国主要确立了以《渔业法》为主的渔业法律体系，而韩国则在水产业法律之外专门确立了水产资源管理法律体系，由不同的法律分别针对渔业的“产业”和“资源”进行调整—这也正是韩国海洋渔业资源立法的一个重要特点；两国所确立的法律制度也存在诸多差异，通过分析两国海洋渔业资源法律制度和所采取的措施，为下文对韩国海洋渔业资源法律的特点—相对于我国，进行总结提供了依据。由于两国还存在着特殊的地缘政治问题，因而从法律层面对两国在专属经济区内渔业资源的开采问题进行分析，为加强我国专属经济区内的渔业管理提出建议也是本文的目的之一。第三部分根据第二章对两国海洋渔业资源法律的研究和对比，提出完善我国海洋渔业资源的立法建议，并针对专属经济区内渔业纠纷问题，提出了相应的解决措施。我国渔业立法起步较晚，所建立的法律体系中尚存在许多亟待完善的地方，而通过分析，韩国海洋渔业资源方面的立法中，的确有许多方法值得我们学习和借鉴，笔者希望通过本文的写作，所提出的完善我国立法的建议，能够为我国渔业法的完善和渔业的可持续发展贡献微薄之力。
[Abstract]:As a traditional fishing country, China and Korea attach great importance to the exploitation of marine fishery resources. Due to the differences in politics, economic system and historical development between the two countries, the legislation on marine fishery resources is different between the two countries. In recent years, South Korea has made its marine fishery resources legislation mature through continuous revision of the law. However, at present, there are relatively few researches on Korean fishery resources law from the legal level, especially in the past five years, Korea has carried on the extremely frequent revision to the related laws one after another. At present, the domestic research results have been difficult to reflect the current legislative status of Korean marine fishery resources. Therefore, through the comparative research method, this paper combs and analyzes the current legislation of South Korea's marine fishery resources, and draws lessons from the advanced legislative experience of Korea by comparing and summing up the advanced legislation experience. Therefore, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the law of marine fishery resources in China. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this article is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the development of marine fishery in the two countries. The second part, as the focus of this paper, provides the basis for the following suggestions. First of all, our country's legislation on marine fishery resources is mainly the Fisheries Law, while South Korea specifically formulates the Fisheries Resources Management Law. At the same time, the Korean fishery belongs to the category of aquaculture, so it formulates the Fisheries Act to adjust fishery activities. In order to clarify the definition of marine fishery resources in this paper, it is necessary to clarify the meaning of the terms related to this article, such as fishery and aquaculture. Secondly, the legal systems of the two countries in marine fishery resources are very different. China has mainly established a fishery legal system based on the Fisheries Law, while South Korea has established a special legal system for the management of aquatic resources in addition to the aquatic industry law. The adjustment of the "industry" and "resources" of fisheries by different laws is an important feature of Korea's legislation on marine fishery resources, and there are also many differences in the legal systems established by the two countries. By analyzing the legal system of marine fishery resources and the measures taken by the two countries, this paper provides a basis for summarizing the characteristics of Korea's marine fishery resources laws compared with China. As there are also special geopolitical problems in the two countries, the legal aspects of the exploitation of fishery resources in the exclusive economic zone between the two countries are analyzed. It is also one of the purposes of this paper to put forward suggestions to strengthen fishery management in China's exclusive economic zone. In the third part, according to the research and comparison of the two countries' marine fishery resources laws in the second chapter, the author puts forward the legislative suggestions to perfect the marine fishery resources in China, and puts forward the corresponding solutions to the fishery disputes in the exclusive economic zone. The fishery legislation of our country starts relatively late, and there are still many places in the legal system that need to be perfected. However, through the analysis, there are many methods in the legislation of Korea's marine fishery resources, which are worthy of our study and reference. The author hopes that, through the writing of this paper, the suggestions of perfecting our country's legislation can contribute to the perfection of our country's fisheries law and the sustainable development of fishery.
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D931.26;D922.4;F326.4

【参考文献】