邦联国会争取商贸管理权的努力及意义

发布时间：2018-06-18 05:22

本文选题：邦联国会 + 商贸管理权力　；参考：《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：美国《邦联条例》没有授予当时的国家政府——邦联国会管理国家商贸的权力,为了应对外国尤其是英国的商贸政策,协调和发展合众国商业贸易,各商业利益群体、外交大使以及各州,普遍呼吁赋予邦联国会部分或全面管理商贸的权力。为此,邦联国会也进行了不懈努力,希望各州能够授予它部分或全面管理商贸的权力。由于《邦联条例》体制的制约、各州利益的分化等因素的阻碍,这一努力终未能获得成功。但邦联国会争取商贸管理权的实践,为《联邦宪法》将管理商贸的权力授予国会奠定了思想舆论基础。通过这样一场运动,人们日益意识到不摆脱《邦联条例》的修宪框架,任何形式的宪政改革都不可能获得成功。因此,必须采取某种办法绕过邦联体制,去赋予全国性政府必要的权力,进而完善联盟国家。
[Abstract]:The United States Confederate regulations did not confer on the then National Government, the Confederate Congress, the power to administer national commerce and trade, and to coordinate and develop the commercial trade of the United States in order to respond to the commercial policies of foreign countries, especially Britain, and to coordinate and develop the commercial interests of the United States, Foreign ambassadors and states have called for the Confederate Congress to exercise partial or full authority over commerce and commerce. To that end, the Confederate Congress has worked tirelessly to give it partial or full control of commerce and commerce. This effort was unsuccessful because of the constraints of the Confederate system, the division of state interests, and other factors. But the practice of the Confederate Congress fighting for the management of trade and commerce laid the ideological and public opinion foundation for the Federal Constitution to delegate the power to manage trade and trade to the Congress. Through such a movement, people increasingly realized that no form of constitutional reform could be successful without getting rid of the framework of amending the Constitution of the Confederacy. Therefore, some way must be taken to bypass the Confederate system, to give the necessary powers to the national government and to perfect the Union country.
【作者单位】：湖南科技大学法学与公共管理学院;
【基金】：2014年湖南省教育教学改革项目“历史专业学生个性化培养研究与实践”
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.1

【相似文献】