入世议定书的法律性质和效力

发布时间：2018-06-21 01:29

本文选题：多边协定 + 实体内容　；参考：《环球法律评论》2014年02期

【摘要】：正编者按WTO"中国-原材料案"和"中国-稀土案"引起了国内外法学界对于入世议定书的法律性质和效力,特别是其与WTO多边协定之间关系的深入思考和广泛讨论。与传统条约法下加入条约基本上是一个程序性问题、不涉及条约实体内容不同,入世议定书为新加入成员创设了与WTO多边协定的既有规则不尽吻合的权利和义务。应当如何理解这些权利和义务,或者更确切地说,如何理解创设这些权利和义务的入世议定书相关条款?
[Abstract]:The "China-Raw material case" and "China-rare Earth case" have aroused deep thinking and extensive discussion on the legal nature and effect of the protocol of entry into WTO, especially on the relationship between WTO and multilateral agreements. Joining the treaty under the traditional treaty law is basically a procedural issue and does not involve the content of the treaty entity. The protocol of accession to the WTO creates rights and obligations which are inconsistent with the existing rules of the multilateral agreement of WTO for the new members to join the WTO. How should these rights and obligations be understood, or more precisely, the relevant provisions of the Protocol on accession that created them?
【分类号】：+

【相似文献】