“以人为本”的利益衡量
发布时间:2018-06-21 10:53
本文选题:利益衡量 + 以人为本 ; 参考:《山东大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国有句至理名言:“天下熙熙,皆为利来,天下攘攘,皆为利往”,这句话的意思不难理解,意思是说天下人为了利益蜂拥而至,为了利益各奔东西。这句至理名言不但适用于国人,在全世界也是通用的。利益衡量理论的出现,在某种意义上来说,也是这一名言在法学中的生动体现。当下利益衡量理论在司法领域得到了前所未有的重视,甚至有一种扩大化使用的趋势。与此同时,“以人为本”思想的优势也是显而易见的,它不仅尊重生命权与健康权的存在、满足人的正常与合理的权利需求、秉持人文主义精神、实现对人权的尊重,而且还加强对弱势群体权益的特殊保护以及及时摒弃不合理的政策法规。正是这些优势的存在,其在政治上被高度重视,在司法领域以人为本也已成为“高频”词汇,其具有的强烈的人文主义关怀吸引了学术界与司法界的眼球。 因此,将二者有机结合起来,形成一种“以人为本”式的利益衡量模式。在这一模式下,我们既要善于使用利益衡量理论为司法服务,又要学会自觉的将“以人为本”理念贯彻到审判之中。当然,“硬币都是有正反面的”,“以人为本”的利益衡量也存在其“短板”,在遇到上述情形时,又需要善于利用法规予以“微创”。唯有如此,才能更好的追求司法正义,造福社会、民众! 具体说来,文章共分三部分,安排如下: 第一章主要探讨了利益衡量与以人为本的关系。第一节主要探讨了以人为本理念在中西方的起源与发展进程,并对当下以人为本理念对法治社会的要求进行了分析。第二节探讨了利益衡量的概念、发展历程、特征以及操作步骤等等。通过这些研究可以对利益衡量理论形成一个透彻的认识。第三节探讨了利益衡量与以人为本的关系,即以人为本的理念指导着利益衡量的考量和贯彻运用,是利益衡量的理论基础之一,另一方面贯彻运用利益衡量能够更好的体现以人为本的理念,实现以人为本的价值所在 第二章分析了在利益衡量中坚持“以人为本”的意义。在前文中我们用了大量的篇幅介绍利益衡量与以人为本相关的理论,从分析中我们可以看出二者在无形中存在着大量的“合作”的空间。具休来说,利益衡量是一种广义上的法律解释方法,它的使用存在着较大的主观性与自由性,而以人为本这种理念恰好义能对利益衡量进行定得量化与细化,因此二者“创造性”的结合无疑会对当下我国的司法审判带来史多发展的契机。这种模式的优势是显而易见的,它有利于最大限度的解决矛盾,化解纠纷;有利于实现法律效果与社会效果的统一;有利于判决的可执行性,易于民众的理解。 第三章是探讨如何运用利益衡量实现以人为本,本章共分为三节。第一节是“以人为本”的利益衡量的实现方法“,主要包括提升法院形象、加大对法官队伍的培训力度、完善民意进入法院审判的制度、完善法律论证理论的运用、判例制度的构建以及进一步完善调解制度等等。第二节是“以人为本”的利益衡量模式存在的短板,主要有“以人为本”中的“人”究竟该如何理解、“以人为本”易成为恣意审判的工具以及“以人为本”与依法司法会产生“摩擦”等。因此,我们又推行一种“法本微创”的利益衡量。在这一“法本微创”模式下,我们既要善于使用利益衡量理论为司法服务,又要学会自觉的将以人为本理念贯彻到审判之中,而且在遇到与现行法规相冲突的情形时,又要善于“妥协”。
[Abstract]:There is a famous saying in our country: "all the world hee is profitable and the world is bustling, all are good," the meaning of this sentence is not difficult to understand. It means that the world is coming to the benefit of the world for the benefit of the world. This statement is not only applicable to the people, but also in the world. The emergence of the theory of interest measurement is in a certain sense. At the same time, the advantage of the "people-oriented" idea is obvious. It not only respects the existence of the right of life and health, but also satisfies human normal. With a reasonable demand for rights, the humanistic spirit, the realization of respect for human rights, the special protection of the rights and interests of the vulnerable groups and the timely abandoning of unreasonable policies and regulations, it is the existence of these advantages, which has been highly valued politically, and has become a "high frequency" vocabulary in the field of justice. Strong humanistic solicitude has attracted the attention of academia and judiciary.
Therefore, we combine the two together to form a "people-oriented" mode of interest measurement. Under this model, we should be good at using the theory of interest measurement as the judicial service, and also learn to carry out the "people-oriented" concept consciously to the trial. Of course, "coins are both positive and negative" and "people-oriented". The interests measure also has its "short board", in the case of the above situation, we need to be good at using the laws and regulations to "minimally invasive". Only in this way, the better pursuit of judicial justice, the benefit of the society, the people!
In particular, the article is divided into three parts, which are arranged as follows:
The first chapter mainly discusses the relationship between the interest measurement and the people-oriented. The first section mainly discusses the origin and development process of the people-oriented concept in China and the west, and analyzes the requirements of the rule of law society at the moment. The second section discusses the concept of interest measurement, the course of development, the characteristics and the operation steps. These studies can form a thorough understanding of the theory of interest measurement. The third section discusses the relationship between the interest measurement and the people-oriented, that is, the people-oriented concept guides the consideration and implementation of the interest measurement, which is one of the theoretical foundations of the interest measurement, and on the other hand, it can be better reflected by the use of interest measurement. The concept of Ben is to realize the value of people based
The second chapter analyzes the significance of adhering to the "people-oriented" in the interest measurement. In the previous article, we used a large number of paragraphs to introduce the theory of interest measurement and people oriented. From the analysis, we can see that there is a lot of "cooperation" space between the two in the intangible. The method of interpretation has greater subjectivity and freedom, and the concept of "people-oriented" can be quantified and refined. Therefore, the combination of the two "creative" will undoubtedly bring more opportunities to the development of the judicial trial in our country. The advantage of this model is obvious and it is favorable. It is beneficial to realize the unity of the legal effect and the social effect, which is beneficial to the realization of the enforceability of the judgment, and is easy to understand the public.
The third chapter is to discuss how to use the interest measurement to realize the people-oriented, this chapter is divided into three sections. The first section is the realization of the "people-oriented" interest measurement ", mainly including improving the image of the court, increasing the training of the judges, perfecting the system of public opinion entering the court trial, perfecting the application of the theory of legal argumentation, and the case system. The second section is the short board of the "people-oriented" interest measurement model, which is mainly about how to understand the "people" in the "people-oriented". "People-oriented" is easy to be a tool for arbitrariness and "friction" between "people-oriented" and the law of law. In this case, we should not only be good at using the theory of interest measurement as the judicial service, but also learn to carry out the concept of "people-oriented" to the trial, and be good at "compromise" when confronted with the conflict with the current laws and regulations.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈金钊;;法律解释:克制抑或能动[J];北方法学;2010年01期
2 高升;论判决书应详述判决理由[J];当代法学;2002年06期
3 李国光;坚持办案的法律效果与社会效果相统一[J];党建研究;1999年12期
4 陈金钊;;法治反对解释的原则[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年03期
5 杨建军;;“司法能动”在中国的展开[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年01期
6 彭丹云;;浅谈“以人为本”在法律语言中的文化体现[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2006年S1期
7 李辉;;司法能动主义与司法克制主义的比较分析[J];法律方法;2009年00期
8 李辉;;司法能动主义:概念、形式与功能[J];法律方法;2010年00期
9 庞凌;法院如何寻求司法能动主义与克制主义的平衡[J];法律适用;2004年01期
10 吕世伦;任岳鹏;;“以人为本”的法体系研究[J];法学家;2006年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 常倜;司法能动主义研究[D];西南政法大学;2008年
,本文编号:2048363
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2048363.html