同案不同判的理性思考

发布时间：2018-06-23 08:44

本文选题：盗窃 + 诈骗　；参考：《中国检察官》2016年20期

【摘要】："假借手机趁机溜走"的行为在理论与实践中有所争议,同一行为人以同一作案手法在不同地区被分别以盗窃罪与诈骗罪定罪量刑。从实体上分析定性,面对定性盗窃逐渐成为主流观点的趋势,定性诈骗更加符合非法占有行为的关键环节。从程序上看待判决,从中级法院辖区的内部统一到高级法院辖区的省级统一,有必要在一定程度上减少同案不同判的趋势。
[Abstract]:The behavior of "taking advantage of the opportunity of using mobile phone" has been disputed in theory and practice, and the same perpetrator has been convicted and sentenced in different areas for theft and fraud respectively. In the face of the trend that qualitative theft has gradually become the mainstream view, qualitative fraud is more in line with the key link of illegal possession. To a certain extent, it is necessary to reduce the trend of different judgments in the same case, from the internal unification of the intermediate court jurisdiction to the provincial unity of the superior court jurisdiction.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;重庆市南岸区人民检察院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D926.22

【相似文献】