关于触电人身损害赔偿纠纷案例分析

发布时间：2018-06-24 00:25

本文选题：无意思联络数人侵权 + 共同侵权　；参考：《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：2009年12月26日颁布的《侵权责任法》将最高人民法院《关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》所规定的“直接结合”和“间接结合”的判断标准加以改变,以有无主观意思联络为要件,将无意思联络的数人侵权行为与共同侵权行为从本质上区别开来,并以形成累积因果关系或部分因果关系作为无意思联络的数人侵权承担连带责任或按份责任的标准。该规定引起了理论界和实务界的激烈争论,并由此引发了学者们对无意思联络的数人侵权的重新思考：一是无意思联络的数人侵权与共同侵权行为联系与区别；二是无意思联络的数人侵权的构成要件；三是无意思联络的数人侵权的本质特征；四是无意思联络的数人侵权的责任承担。本论文共三章,以案例进行分析说明,首先分析案件双方当事人的不同意见,对案件事实加以认定,其次结合实际案例从与共同侵权行为的对比中分析无意思联络的数人侵权的概念、构成要件、本质特征及类型,并划分本案中各方当事人赔偿责任,提出笔者自己对本案的判决意见；最后根据我国法律规定来进一步探讨无意思联络的数人侵权行为中的责任承担,并阐述一些由本案引发的思考。本论文的主要观点：无意思联络的数人侵权并非共同侵权行为。数侵权人分别实施侵权行为造成同一损害,行为与结果构成累积因果关系,则各侵权人负连带责任,否则,即负按份责任。或原因力不可分,各侵权人负连带责任,原因力可分,则负按份责任。
[Abstract]:The Tort liability Law, promulgated on December 26, 2009, changed the judgment criteria of "direct combination" and "indirect combination" stipulated by the Supreme people's Court in the interpretation of certain issues concerning the applicable Law in cases of personal injury compensation. Taking whether there is a subjective connection or not, the author distinguishes the tort act of several people with no meaning contact from the joint tort act in essence. And taking the formation of cumulative causality or partial causality as the standard of joint and several liability or partial liability. This stipulation has caused the intense debate in the theory and the practice domain, and has caused the scholars to rethink to the multi-person torts which have no meaning contact: first, the connection and the difference between the multi-person torts and the joint torts that do not have the meaning connection; The second is the constitutive elements of the multi-person tort without meaning contact; the third is the essential characteristics of the multi-person tort without the intention contact; the fourth is the liability of the multi-person tort without the intention contact. There are three chapters in this paper, the case analysis, first of all, the analysis of the different views of the parties to the case, to determine the facts of the case, Secondly, it analyzes the concept, elements, essential characteristics and types of the multi-person tort without interest from the comparison between the joint tort and the actual case, and divides the liability of the parties concerned in the case. The author puts forward his own judgment opinion on this case; finally, according to the law of our country, the author further discusses the liability in the torts of several people who have no intention to contact, and expounds some thoughts caused by this case. The main point of this paper is that the tort of several people is not joint tort. If the tortfeasor respectively causes the same damage and the action and the result form a cumulative causality, each infringer shall be jointly and severally liable, otherwise, the infringer will be liable by the share. Or the cause force can not be divided, the infringer shall bear joint liability, the cause force may be divided, then shall bear the share responsibility.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D920.5;D923

【引证文献】