2001-2010年中国公民不服从研究
发布时间:2018-06-26 09:55
本文选题:公民不服从 + 权利 ; 参考:《北方工业大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文第一部分主要通过对公民不服从历史、现状和理论的研究,建立以公民不服从理论对国内实践进行实证考察的基础。西方自然法和“恶法非法”与“恶法亦法”的争论,一直隐含着公民不服从的思想:但是直到契约论成为现实和宪政体制的建立,现代意义的公民不服从才有了理论化乃至制度化的基础。本文以美国为样本对现代型公民不服从进行了全景式考察,并对相关理论学说进行了梳理。本文认为,现代型公民不服从大致可分为两类:一类是罗尔斯理论为代表的权利型公民不服从,另一类是哈贝马斯理论为代表的参与型公民不服从。第一部分最后对公民不服从与中国的传统和现代进行了简单分析,作为第二部分运用公民不服从理论分析国内事例的衔接。 本文第二部分通过新世纪十年中个人型、群体型和网络型公民不服从相关案例的分析,考察了公民不服从在国内的具体情况。本部分目的在与典型意义上的公民不服从比较中得出适合中国的公民不服从的发展缺陷和可能适合中国的公民不服从的形式及发展方向。个人型公民不服从事例中,从孙志刚、孙中界、唐福珍和张海超考察了中国参与型公民不服从的启动和法律法规的修改;从郝劲松、杨支柱和重庆钉子户夫妇考察了中国权利型公民不服从的公民特点;从秦中飞和刘进成考察了公共领域的表达空间。群体型公民不服从事例中,从重庆出租车罢工事件和厦门散步事件考察了中国公民不服从的交流机制和小共同体特征;从瓮安事件、孟连事件和石首事件考察了中国公民不服从中的暴力和政治。网络型公民不服从中,从周久耕事件和躲猫猫事件考察了新媒体的作用,从邓玉娇案和许霆案考察了司法的权威。 本文第三部分对国内公民不服从的情况进行了总体概况,并提出了发展公民不服从所需要的基础性条件。本文认为,当前国内公民不服从,总览事例是典型意义大于普遍意义;总体思路是需要建立全面彻底的法治和宪政。本文最后在“积极公民”和自由权利及其限制等方面对发展公民不服从所需要的基础性条件进行了阐述。
[Abstract]:In the first part of this paper, through the research of the history, the present situation and the theory of citizen disobedience, the author establishes the foundation of the empirical investigation on the domestic practice with the theory of citizen disobedience. The argument between the western natural law and the illegal draconian law and the draconian law has always implied the idea of disobeying the citizen: but until the contract theory became a reality and the establishment of the constitutional system, The civil disobedience in modern sense has a theoretical and even institutionalized basis. This article takes the United States as a sample to conduct a panoramic survey of modern citizens' disobedience, and combs the relevant theories. This paper holds that modern citizen disobedience can be roughly divided into two categories: one is right citizen disobedience represented by Rawls theory, and the other is participatory citizen disobedience represented by Habermas theory. The first part makes a brief analysis of the tradition and modern of the citizen disobedience with China, and analyzes the cohesion of the domestic cases from the theory of the citizen disobedience as the second part. In the second part of this paper, through the analysis of individual type, group type and network type citizen's disobedience in the new century ten years, we investigate the concrete situation of citizen's disobedience in our country. The purpose of this part is to find out from the comparison with the typical sense of citizen disobedience, the development defects suitable for Chinese citizens' disobedience and the form and direction of development which may be suitable for Chinese citizens' disobedience. From the examples of Sun Zhigang, Sun Zhongjie, Tang Fuzhen and Zhang Haichao, they examined the initiation of China's participating citizens' disobedience and the revision of laws and regulations; from Hao Jinsong, Yang Pillar and Chongqing nail-door couple examined the citizen characteristics of China's right citizens disobeying themselves; from Qin Zhongfei and Liu Jincheng they examined the expression space in the public sphere. From the incident of taxi strike in Chongqing and the incident of walking in Xiamen, the article examines the communication mechanism and the characteristics of small community of Chinese citizens' disobedience; from the Weng'an incident, The Menglian incident and the Shishou incident examined the violence and politics in which Chinese citizens disobeyed. The online citizen disobeys, examines the role of the new media from the Zhou Jiugeng incident and the hide and seek incident, and examines the judicial authority from the case of Deng Yujiao and the case of Xu Ting. In the third part of this paper, the general situation of domestic citizens' disobedience is summarized, and the basic conditions for the development of citizens' disobedience are put forward. This paper holds that the typical meaning is greater than the universal meaning and the overall idea is to establish a comprehensive and thorough rule of law and constitutionalism. At the end of this paper, the basic conditions for the development of citizens' disobedience are expounded in the aspects of "active citizens" and the rights of freedom and their limitations.
【学位授予单位】:北方工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李寿初;;超越“恶法非法”与“恶法亦法”——法律与道德关系的本体分析[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
2 颜德如;冯英;;政府是什么?——中国政府改革与建设的前提性思考[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
3 胡玉鸿;;“集体行动”与“人的联合”──以集会、游行为核心的分析[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年01期
4 柯岚;;“自然”与“自然法”概念的古今之异——关于自然法学术史的一个初步反思[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2008年05期
5 梁治平;;“从身份到契约”:社会关系的革命——读梅因《古代法》随想[J];读书;1986年06期
6 张千帆;;中国宪政的路径与局限[J];法学;2011年01期
7 丁以升;;恶法非法论[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2010年06期
8 王振东;;恶法亦法理论的历史寻踪及其价值[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2007年06期
9 王晓烁;;论法的形式正义与守法[J];河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
10 陈海平;;公共领域与人的自由——汉娜·阿伦特的积极公民观及其启示[J];河北学刊;2006年03期
,本文编号:2069991
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2069991.html