近代中国比较法教育辨正——基于东吴大学法学院的考察
发布时间:2018-06-26 22:17
本文选题:东吴大学法学院 + 比较法 ; 参考:《华东政法大学学报》2017年05期
【摘要】:以比较法教育作为办学方针的东吴大学法学院,在近代中国法律教育史中享有很高的地位,历来为学界关注。但至今的研究都没有注意到该校在比较法教育中存在的诸多问题,例如教员的缺课、学生对教学方式的诟病、比较法课程数量的锐减等,这些现象实际是西方法律教育移植后逐渐本土化过程的反映,也是中央与地方教育自主权博弈的结果。比较法课程重要性的降低,教育部及司法院对法学院发展的限制,兼职教员微薄的薪资,都对比较法教学产生了重要影响。解析东吴大学法学院比较法教育发生转变的原因,为反思民国法律教育的得失提供了新的视角。
[Abstract]:The School of Law of Soochow University, which regards comparative law education as its educational policy, enjoys a high status in the history of legal education in modern China and has always been concerned by scholars. However, so far, many problems in comparative law education have not been noticed, such as the absence of teachers, the students' criticism of teaching methods, the sharp decrease in the number of comparative law courses, and so on. These phenomena actually reflect the process of localization after the transplantation of western legal education, and are also the result of the game between central and local educational autonomy. The decrease in importance of comparative law courses, the restrictions on the development of law schools by the Ministry of Education and the School of Justice, and the meagre salary of part-time teachers have had an important impact on the teaching of comparative law. The analysis of the reasons for the change of comparative law education in the Law School of Soochow University provides a new perspective for reflection on the gains and losses of legal education in the Republic of China.
【作者单位】: 中共上海市委党校第二分校;
【分类号】:D908-4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 孙伟;;我国最早的大学法学期刊——东吴大学之《法学季刊》[J];出版发行研究;2008年03期
,本文编号:2071601
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2071601.html