法律诠释学三大模式的建构

发布时间：2018-06-27 18:01

本文选题：法律诠释 + 法律规则　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：今天的中国社会正处在一个迅速变化的时期,法律的发展面临着新的挑战。一方面,人们力图建立一个尽可能稳定的法律体系;但是另一方面,社会转型的现实又要求法律保有足够的弹性。这就需要法官在运用法律时对其进行“解释”,以期与现实相适应。而“法律诠释”则是广义的“法律解释”下一种独特的方法。法律诠释借哲学诠释学的分析视角,强调对法律的意义进行理解,而非固化规则的简单套用。其所重视的理解,包括了在规则空缺条件下的意义追寻,法律原则碰撞时比较选择,以及多元社会中的对话融合,因而也有了本文所推崇的三大诠释模式。第一种模式介绍了在有比较完整的法律规定条件下,法官如何运用法律诠释思维填补法条空缺结构。第二种是疑难案件中,如何通过“链条思维”进行原则立论,又如何在各原则间判断取舍。第三种强调在“公共协商”要求日益高涨的现代社会,法官通过“对话商谈”的模式,回应民众呼声,最终得出法律判决。三大法律诠释模式虽然主张其“主观性”,但亦有其“客观性”,其体现的是相对客观的“辨证式”的思维方式。法律诠释学未能包办一切,但可以肯定,它能为法律实践提供更加丰富的理论资源和操作指南,引导中国的法治建设。
[Abstract]:Today's Chinese society is in a period of rapid change, the development of law is facing new challenges. On the one hand, people try to establish a legal system as stable as possible, but on the other hand, the reality of social transformation requires that the law be flexible enough. This requires the judge to interpret the law in order to adapt to the reality. The interpretation of law is a unique method in the broad sense of interpretation of law. From the perspective of philosophical hermeneutics, legal interpretation emphasizes the understanding of the meaning of law, rather than the simple application of solidified rules. Its understanding includes the pursuit of meaning under the condition of lack of rules, the comparative choice when the legal principles collide, and the integration of dialogue in the pluralistic society, so it also has the three modes of interpretation advocated in this paper. The first model introduces how to use the law interpretation thinking to fill the vacant structure of the law under the condition of relatively complete legal stipulation. The second is how to discuss the principle through chain thinking, and how to judge and choose among the principles in difficult cases. The third emphasizes that in a modern society where "public consultation" is increasingly required, judges respond to popular demands by means of "dialogue and negotiation", and finally reach a legal verdict. Although the three major modes of legal interpretation advocate their subjectivity, they also have their objectivity, which embodies a relatively objective mode of thinking. Legal hermeneutics can not deal with everything, but it can certainly provide more abundant theoretical resources and operational guidelines for legal practice and guide the construction of the rule of law in China.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】