日本标准必要专利损害赔偿额的计算——以“Apple Japan vs. Samsung”案为视角

发布时间：2018-06-30 19:40

  本文选题：公平、合理、无歧视条款 + 专利劫持　； 参考：《知识产权》2017年03期

【摘要】：专利技术被策定为标准必要专利后,如专利权人仍可肆意行使其排他权利会阻碍标准的实施。专利权人作出FRAND承诺,这意味着专利权人排他权利的行使会受到限制。但是,由于FRAND承诺的效力不及于未参与标准制定过程中的第三人,由此可能导致专利劫持问题。适当的损害赔偿额是解决专利劫持问题的根本路径之一。日本"Apple Japan vs.Samsung"案中损害赔偿额的计算前提是损害赔偿额等于专利许可费,具体计算符合FRAND承诺的专利许可费时,为防止专利许可费堆叠问题,使用了"设定峰值法"。
[Abstract]:If patentee can still exercise his exclusive right, it will hinder the implementation of the standard. The patentee's commitment to FRAND means that the exercise of patentee's exclusive rights will be restricted. However, because the FRAND commitment is not as effective as the third party who did not participate in the standard-setting process, it may lead to the problem of patent hijacking. Proper compensation is one of the fundamental ways to solve the problem of patent hijacking. In the case of Apple Japan vs.Samsung, the calculation of damages is based on the premise that the amount of damages is equal to the patent license fee. In order to prevent the stacking of patent license fees, the "peak setting method" is used to calculate the patent license fee in accordance with the promise of FRAND.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院;
【分类号】：D931.3;DD913
，

本文编号：2086618