唐代杂治考论

发布时间：2018-07-10 10:21

本文选题：唐代 + 杂治　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年02期

【摘要】：唐代永徽以后,杂治并未被三司推事所彻底取代,反而对“三司”制度形成相当冲击与影响,所谓“三司推事”常有名实不符之困境。究其根本,乃是杂治惯例持续起效之表征。“受事三司”的逐步淡出与“推事三司”之尴尬境遇,均源自传统杂治惯例的强势干预。从杂治到三司,乃至三司使的出现,群臣杂治惯例始终是唐代诏狱会审之主流模式,御史台在杂治规则运行中占据优越地位。至中晚唐时期,杂治地位呈现下移趋势。
[Abstract]:After the Tang Dynasty Yonghui, miscellaneous governance was not completely replaced by the "three divisions" judge, on the contrary, the "three divisions" system formed a considerable impact and influence, the so-called "three divisions" often do not agree with the plight of the name. The root of it is the symbol of the continuous effect of the rule of miscellaneous governance. The gradual fading out of the "three divisions" and the embarrassing situation of the "three divisions of judges" all stem from the strong intervention of the traditional miscellaneous rule. From miscellaneous governance to three departments, and even the emergence of the three departments, the rule of miscellaneous governance of officials has always been the mainstream mode of the imperial court in the Tang Dynasty, and the imperial court occupies a superior position in the operation of miscellaneous governance rules. To the middle and late Tang Dynasty, the status of miscellaneous governance showed a downward trend.
【作者单位】：西北政法大学刑事法学院;
【分类号】：DF092

【相似文献】