论哈盖尔斯特罗姆的现实主义法学思想
[Abstract]:Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought is a unique ideological theory in western legal theory, which is based on the philosophy of experience and pays attention to understanding the law from the angle of psychology. This legal thought not only criticizes the metaphysical factors contained in the traditional legal concept, but also opposes the analytical positivist legal theory through criticizing the legal command theory. Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought has a wide influence in Scandinavian countries and in other western countries. This idea is still the mainstream legal thought in Scandinavia. In China, Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought has been introduced sporadically, but has not been paid much attention to and studied systematically. In view of this, the purpose of this paper is to make a systematic analysis of Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought. The main part of this paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is the discussion on the course and background of Hagher Strom's thought, in which the author will explain the background of Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought from three aspects, specifically referring to the value bewilderment of Scandinavians in the period of drastic change. Marx's influence on Hagher Strom and the popularity of positivism. The second chapter focuses on the basic content of Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought, discusses its basic philosophical viewpoint, criticizes the concept of traditional law, explains the psychology of law, and points out the viewpoint of legal compulsion. And the concept of justice contained in this thought. The third chapter discusses the historical position and realistic influence of Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought. This chapter will include summing up the distinct historical evaluation of Hagher Strom's realistic legal thought, analyzing the causes of this phenomenon, and trying to put forward a relatively fair evaluation. By presenting a different legal perspective, this paper hopes to inspire people to re-examine and further reflect on the relationship between law and national, social and human values. Gain the understanding of the western legal thought and the foreign ideological resources of the legal theory construction in the domestic legal circles.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D90
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵运锋;;刑法解释立场:在形式主义与现实主义之间[J];东方法学;2011年04期
2 崔永东;;司法社会学的学术旨趣与基本问题试探[J];法治研究;2011年07期
3 李政辉;;解构企业:企业社会责任的后现代解读[J];中国商法年刊;2009年00期
4 孙海波;;法律概念的主权之维:奥斯丁与法律实证主义[J];研究生法学;2011年02期
5 卢结针;;论人权中经济与社会权利——解读《司法保障人权的限度——经济和社会权利可诉性问题研究》[J];学理论;2011年17期
6 王晓光;;霍姆斯法律思想的现代性分析[J];法学杂志;2011年08期
7 曹智;;女性主义和女性主义法学之定位[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2011年03期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 陈柳钦;;法经济学的动态演化及其中国的发展[A];2011年(第九届)“中国法经济学论坛”论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 陈金钊(作者为山东大学法学院教授);理想与现实之间(下)[N];法制日报;2000年
2 作者为山东大学法学院教授 陈金钊;理想与现实之间[N];法制日报;2000年
3 宣海林;国际法学科困境的注解[N];人民法院报;2005年
4 厦门大学法学院副教授 周刚志;论“司法为民”视野下的法律思维[N];人民法院报;2009年
5 胡昌明;实用主义法律思想的代表:霍姆斯[N];人民法院报;2010年
6 喻中;法律哲学与法律科学的分野[N];光明日报;2005年
7 浙江大学法学院副教授 李 华;国家要介入家庭暴力案件[N];人民法院报;2004年
8 林U,
本文编号:2122864
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2122864.html