略论社科法学与教义法学的理论分歧——以对中国法律实践的认知为视角
发布时间：2018-08-03 12:35
【摘要】：社科法学强调对于"现实"与"中国"的关注,批评教义法学是一个不顾国情的舶来品,这样的看法源于社科法学与教义法学对中国法律实践的认识分歧。社科法学强调中国法律实践中合法性评价的多元性,审判活动与日常判断的相似性;而教义法学则主张实证法秩序在合法性评价上的权威性,以及审判活动中法律思维的特殊性。法学的跨领域研究必须从法学的立场出发,法学理论并非现实的摹写,社科法学在研究方法和理论主张两方面都应有足够的自觉。
[Abstract]:The social science law emphasizes the concern about "reality" and "China", and criticizes the doctrine law is an import which disregards the national conditions. This view originates from the different understanding of the Chinese legal practice between the social science law and the dogmatic law. Social science law emphasizes the pluralism of legitimacy evaluation in Chinese legal practice, the similarity between judicial activities and daily judgment, while the dogmatic jurisprudence advocates the authority of the order of positive law in legitimacy evaluation. And the particularity of legal thinking in judicial activities. The cross-domain research of law must proceed from the standpoint of law, the theory of law is not a realistic description, and the law of social science should be conscious enough in both the research method and the theory proposition.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;南京大学中德比较法研究所;
【分类号】：D90
，
本文编号：2161768
[Abstract]:The social science law emphasizes the concern about "reality" and "China", and criticizes the doctrine law is an import which disregards the national conditions. This view originates from the different understanding of the Chinese legal practice between the social science law and the dogmatic law. Social science law emphasizes the pluralism of legitimacy evaluation in Chinese legal practice, the similarity between judicial activities and daily judgment, while the dogmatic jurisprudence advocates the authority of the order of positive law in legitimacy evaluation. And the particularity of legal thinking in judicial activities. The cross-domain research of law must proceed from the standpoint of law, the theory of law is not a realistic description, and the law of social science should be conscious enough in both the research method and the theory proposition.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;南京大学中德比较法研究所;
【分类号】：D90
，
本文编号：2161768
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2161768.html
