德国侵权法上的招惹规则——从追踪人请求损害赔偿的判例和学说切入
发布时间：2018-08-03 12:01
【摘要】：招惹规则属于德国判例法的一项成果,主要由近50年以来一系列追踪判例发展而来。根据德国联邦最高法院的审判要旨,凡以可谴责的方式,使他人受到招惹,并出于正当的动机实施某种介入行为,引起风险升高,而且介入的目的与风险处于适度的关系,则须对所产生的损害承担赔偿责任。关于这一规则的理论争鸣主要集中在对"适当性"这项构成要件的理解、该规则与其他因果关系理论的关系以及它在各种精神中介的因果关系案例类型中的可适用性。我国侵权法可以通过吸纳德国招惹规则要求的核心构成要件,构建一般因果关系理论上的招惹标准,作为相当性补充标准,用于认定相应精神中介的因果关系。
[Abstract]:The rules of provoke belong to a result of the German case law, mainly from a series of follow-up cases developed over the past 50 years. According to the trial gist of the Supreme Court of the German Federal Supreme Court, everyone is provoked in a reprehensible manner, and the risk is raised, and the purpose and risk of intervention are raised. The theoretical contention about this rule is mainly focused on the understanding of the constitutive requirements of "appropriateness", the relationship between the rule and other causality theory and the applicability of it in the causality case types of various spiritual intermediaries. By absorbing the core elements of the requirements of the German provoke rules, the standard of provoke in the theory of general causality is constructed as a complementary standard for determining the causality of the corresponding spiritual intermediary.
【作者单位】： 德国哥廷根大学法学院;
【分类号】：D951.6;DD913
[Abstract]:The rules of provoke belong to a result of the German case law, mainly from a series of follow-up cases developed over the past 50 years. According to the trial gist of the Supreme Court of the German Federal Supreme Court, everyone is provoked in a reprehensible manner, and the risk is raised, and the purpose and risk of intervention are raised. The theoretical contention about this rule is mainly focused on the understanding of the constitutive requirements of "appropriateness", the relationship between the rule and other causality theory and the applicability of it in the causality case types of various spiritual intermediaries. By absorbing the core elements of the requirements of the German provoke rules, the standard of provoke in the theory of general causality is constructed as a complementary standard for determining the causality of the corresponding spiritual intermediary.
【作者单位】： 德国哥廷根大学法学院;
【分类号】：D951.6;DD913
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 朱岩;;当代德国侵权法上因果关系理论和实务中的主要问题[J];法学家;2004年06期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 鲁杨;闾梓睿;;相当因果关系理论浅析[J];湖北社会科学;2011年04期
2 郝斌;;论侵权法上因果关系的结构与价值[J];呼伦贝尔学院学报;2006年05期
3 王宇;田s，
本文编号：2161683
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2161683.html
