中美网络版权技术措施保护比较研究

发布时间：2018-08-04 18:50

【摘要】：由于网络信息环境的特殊性,网络版权的维护也固有其独特性。数字化环境下,网络版权的技术措施保护已成为司法实践和理论研究的重点问题之一,由技术措施而产生的规避与反规避的一系列问题也浮出水面。这就要求各国采取相应的版权立法去平衡版权人及相关权利人与社会公众利用网络信息之间的利益。本文通过对中美网络版权技术措施保护的比较研究,分析得出我国网络版权技术措施保护层面与美国存在的差距,以及我国网络版权保护存在的亟待解决的问题。全文共分五个部分对中美网络版权技术措施保护展开论述: 第一部分为技术措施的概述。首先,通过对中美两国学术界和法律界对技术措施不同定义的研究,归纳出了技术措施的基本定义,其次,介绍了技术措施的分类情况。然后论述了技术措施的构成要件。接着重点分析了技术措施保护所面对的困境,即如何协调各方之间的利益平衡。第二部分为技术措施权的比较分析。该部分首先系统的介绍了技术措施的主体、客体。然后,比较分析了中美技术措施权的内容。第三部分为中美技术措施的限制比较分析。依次介绍了中国在《信息网络传播权保护条例》中列举的四大类技术措施规避的免责情况,美国在《数字千年版权法》中对技术措施规避例外的7大类规定,美国新近第四次关于免责数字产品的公告内容。通过对比分析,提炼得出我国在此领域内需要改进的地方。第四部分为中美技术措施规避责任的比较分析。规避责任分两种情况:一是直接规避技术措施的责任承担;二是帮助规避技术措施的责任问题。美国对此两方面的规避责任都有法律规定,而我国主要是针对直接规避行为。本文认为,我国版权领域内,为规避技术措施提供帮助的行为应该按照一般的违法责任予以追究,否则会片面增加版权人寻求版权法律保护的成本。第五部分为对我国技术措施保护的启示。通过对中美网络版权技术措施各方面的比较分析,提出了完善我国技术措施保护的建议。
[Abstract]:Because of the particularity of network information environment, the maintenance of network copyright is also inherent in its uniqueness. In the digital environment, the protection of network copyright has become one of the key issues in judicial practice and theoretical research, and a series of problems of circumvention and anti-circumvention arising from technical measures have also emerged. This requires countries to adopt corresponding copyright legislation to balance the interests of copyright owners and relevant rights holders and the public in the use of network information. Based on the comparative study of network copyright measures between China and the United States, this paper analyzes the gap between China's network copyright technology measures and the United States, and the problems to be solved in our country's network copyright protection. The thesis is divided into five parts: the first part is the summary of technical measures. Firstly, by studying the different definitions of technical measures in the academic and legal circles of China and the United States, the basic definitions of technical measures are summed up, and the classification of technical measures is introduced. Then it discusses the composing elements of technical measures. Then it analyzes the dilemma of technical protection, that is, how to balance the interests of all parties. The second part is the comparative analysis of the right of technical measures. In this part, the subject and object of technical measures are introduced systematically. Then, the contents of the right of technical measures between China and the United States are compared and analyzed. The third part is the comparative analysis of technical measures between China and the United States. In turn, this paper introduces the exemption cases of four categories of technical measures evasion listed in China's regulations on the Protection of Information Network Transmission right. The United States in the Digital Millennium copyright Law provides seven major categories of technical measures to circumvent exceptions. The United States for the fourth time recently on the release of digital products announcement content. Through comparative analysis, we can find out the areas that need to be improved in our country. The fourth part is the comparative analysis of Chinese and American technical measures to avoid responsibility. There are two situations of evading responsibility: one is to bear the responsibility of circumventing technical measures directly; the other is to help circumvent the responsibility of technical measures. The United States has legal provisions on both aspects of evading responsibility, while our country mainly aims at direct circumvention. This paper holds that in the field of copyright in our country, the behavior of providing assistance for circumventing technical measures should be investigated according to the general liability of violating the law, otherwise, the cost of seeking the legal protection of copyright by copyright owners will be increased one-sidedly. The fifth part is the enlightenment to our country's technical measure protection. Based on the comparative analysis of Chinese and American network copyright technical measures, the paper puts forward some suggestions for perfecting the protection of China's technological measures.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41;D971.2

【参考文献】