美国对华钢铁业反补贴实证分析
发布时间：2018-08-05 15:33
【摘要】：近年来,随着中美双边经贸的快速发展,双方之间的贸易争端日益增多。美国在国内贸易保护主义的压力下,频繁的对中国产品采取贸易保护主义措施。从2006年的铜版纸案开始,截止2011年8月,美国对华产品进行了三十多起反补贴调查,是WTO成员中对华采取反补贴措施最多的国家。在这其中,中国钢铁产品遭受的损失尤为严重,从案件数量和金额上来说均超过半数。从2007年的环状焊接碳素钢管案开始,到2011年8月,美国共对中国钢铁产品发动了十五起反补贴调查,目前已经做出终裁的有十二起案件,其中否定性终裁案件有两起。本文主要分析了美国对华钢铁业已经做出终裁的十二起案件,统计了美国商务部对华钢铁业补贴的重点调查项目,分析了美国商务部在初裁时所认定的补贴项目,找出其中双方争议的焦点问题,并从企业和政府两个方面提出一系列对策。 本文由导言、正文和结语三部分构成,其中正文部分共分三章。 第一章主要是对美国对华钢铁业系列反补贴案进行统计,从发生频率、涉案标的和调查项目三个方面进行了统计分析,整理出了美商务部在对华钢铁业反补贴时的重点调查项目,同时针对美商务部初裁认定的补贴项目进行了重点研究,以期引起国内产业的重视。 第二章主要是美国对华钢铁业反补贴中的实体和程序问题分析。在实体问题方面,主要从补贴的认定、美国对华产品反补贴历程及原因、美国对华钢铁产品反补贴税的计算三个方面展开;在程序问题方面,主要从反补贴调查机关、反补贴案的发起与调查、行政复审和司法复审四方面展开。 第三章主要是应对美国反补贴的对策分析。在企业方面,主要提出了积极应对美国的反补贴调查;充分利用美国国内法律,积极进行行政和司法救济;转变投资方式;加快钢铁业的整合,增强抵御风险的能力等建议。在政府方面,主要提出了调整和合理使用、配置国内的补贴政策;建立完善预警联动机制,发挥行业协会的作用;充分利用好出口退税政策;善于利用世贸组织争端解决机制对美进行诉讼;适时对美产品进行反补贴制裁等建议。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of bilateral economic and trade between China and the United States, trade disputes between the two sides are increasing day by day. Under the pressure of domestic trade protectionism, the United States frequently takes protectionist measures against Chinese products. Since the 2006 coated Paper case, as of August 2011, the United States has conducted more than 30 countervailing investigations on Chinese products, making it the country with the most countervailing measures to China among WTO members. China's steel products have suffered particularly badly, with more than half of the cases in terms of both the number of cases and the amount of money involved. From the 2007 annular welded carbon steel pipe case, to August 2011, the United States launched 15 countervailing investigations into Chinese steel products. At present, there are 12 final cases, of which two are negative cases. This paper mainly analyzes 12 cases in which the US steel industry has already made a final decision, counts the key investigation items of the US Department of Commerce's subsidies to China's steel industry, and analyzes the subsidy items identified by the US Department of Commerce at the time of the initial adjudication. To find out the focus of dispute between the two sides, and put forward a series of countermeasures from two aspects of enterprise and government. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is mainly about the statistics of the series of countervailing cases of steel and iron industry of the United States to China, which are statistically analyzed from three aspects: frequency of occurrence, target involved in the case and investigation project. The key investigation items of the US Ministry of Commerce in the countervailing of steel and iron industry to China have been sorted out. At the same time, the key research on the subsidy items identified by the US Ministry of Commerce has been carried out in order to arouse the attention of the domestic industry. The second chapter is the analysis of entity and procedure in anti-subsidy of steel industry to China. In terms of substantive issues, mainly from the recognition of subsidies, the history and reasons of US countervailing products to China, the calculation of US countervailing duties on Chinese steel products, and the procedural aspects, mainly from the countervailing investigation agencies. The initiation and investigation of countervailing cases, administrative review and judicial review are carried out. The third chapter is the countermeasure analysis of countervailing to the United States. In the aspect of enterprises, some suggestions are put forward, such as actively responding to the countervailing investigation in the United States, making full use of the domestic laws of the United States, actively carrying out administrative and judicial relief, changing the mode of investment, speeding up the integration of the steel industry and strengthening the ability to resist risks, and so on. On the government side, it mainly puts forward the adjustment and rational use, the allocation of domestic subsidy policy, the establishment and improvement of the linkage mechanism of early warning, the exertion of the role of the trade association, the full use of the export tax rebate policy; Good at using the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to litigate against the United States; timely countervailing sanctions against American products and other suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29;D996.1;F752.7
本文编号：2166225
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of bilateral economic and trade between China and the United States, trade disputes between the two sides are increasing day by day. Under the pressure of domestic trade protectionism, the United States frequently takes protectionist measures against Chinese products. Since the 2006 coated Paper case, as of August 2011, the United States has conducted more than 30 countervailing investigations on Chinese products, making it the country with the most countervailing measures to China among WTO members. China's steel products have suffered particularly badly, with more than half of the cases in terms of both the number of cases and the amount of money involved. From the 2007 annular welded carbon steel pipe case, to August 2011, the United States launched 15 countervailing investigations into Chinese steel products. At present, there are 12 final cases, of which two are negative cases. This paper mainly analyzes 12 cases in which the US steel industry has already made a final decision, counts the key investigation items of the US Department of Commerce's subsidies to China's steel industry, and analyzes the subsidy items identified by the US Department of Commerce at the time of the initial adjudication. To find out the focus of dispute between the two sides, and put forward a series of countermeasures from two aspects of enterprise and government. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter is mainly about the statistics of the series of countervailing cases of steel and iron industry of the United States to China, which are statistically analyzed from three aspects: frequency of occurrence, target involved in the case and investigation project. The key investigation items of the US Ministry of Commerce in the countervailing of steel and iron industry to China have been sorted out. At the same time, the key research on the subsidy items identified by the US Ministry of Commerce has been carried out in order to arouse the attention of the domestic industry. The second chapter is the analysis of entity and procedure in anti-subsidy of steel industry to China. In terms of substantive issues, mainly from the recognition of subsidies, the history and reasons of US countervailing products to China, the calculation of US countervailing duties on Chinese steel products, and the procedural aspects, mainly from the countervailing investigation agencies. The initiation and investigation of countervailing cases, administrative review and judicial review are carried out. The third chapter is the countermeasure analysis of countervailing to the United States. In the aspect of enterprises, some suggestions are put forward, such as actively responding to the countervailing investigation in the United States, making full use of the domestic laws of the United States, actively carrying out administrative and judicial relief, changing the mode of investment, speeding up the integration of the steel industry and strengthening the ability to resist risks, and so on. On the government side, it mainly puts forward the adjustment and rational use, the allocation of domestic subsidy policy, the establishment and improvement of the linkage mechanism of early warning, the exertion of the role of the trade association, the full use of the export tax rebate policy; Good at using the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to litigate against the United States; timely countervailing sanctions against American products and other suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29;D996.1;F752.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 史爱丽;;查询工商登记档案 维护中国企业利益[J];北京档案;2009年10期
2 吴薇;;中小企业面临的“双反”困局及思考[J];对外经贸实务;2010年01期
3 李鹤林;田伟;邝献任;;油井管供需形势分析与对策[J];钢管;2010年01期
4 王宁;赵鹏;向双娣;李建新;;对我国油井管产业发展的几点认识[J];钢管;2011年03期
5 唐宜红;唐若韬;;美国对华反补贴的焦点问题与我国的对策[J];国际贸易;2010年05期
6 张剑;何海燕;;反补贴产业损害评估指标体系的构建[J];华东经济管理;2011年01期
7 顾晓莉;;“双反”大棒砸向油井管[J];石油石化物资采购;2010年Z1期
8 郭金刚;师国敏;;我国出口信贷的现状分析及发展对策[J];经济师;2008年03期
9 罗汉伟;;美钢铁保护引发国际公愤 中国或将卷入国际钢铁贸易战[J];中国经济周刊;2010年31期
10 刘海民;;简评美国Wiley Rein律师所“中国补贴钢铁”报告——兼论我国钢铁产业的成本竞争力问题[J];冶金管理;2008年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 中国社科院法学所 刘敬东;[N];经济参考报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 林惠玲;美国反补贴实体法律实施问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘慧;美国反补贴法的修改动向及中国的应对[D];中国政法大学;2011年
2 李秋华;论美国反补贴法及我国的对策[D];山东大学;2010年
，本文编号：2166225
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2166225.html
