中美经济法比较研究
发布时间：2018-08-08 15:33
【摘要】：中国和美国分属不同的政治制度和法系,经济法也呈现出各自不同的特征,这是由于两国不同的历史发展轨迹和特殊的历史背景、文化背景、经济背景所决定的。但是作为社会主义经济法的中国经济法与作为资本主义经济法的美国经济法并不是完全不同的,二者之前存在着一定的共性,这是现代经济法的内在特征所决定的。本文意在从中美两国经济法比较之中,发现资本主义经济法和社会主义经济法的共性和不同之处,为我国经济法对资本主义经济法的借鉴提供理论参考。具体来讲,中美经济法的产生模式不同、经济民主与经济集中的程度不同、宏观调控的力度不同等。但是二者都是现代经济法,都是国家之手和市场之首的协同并用,体现着政策性和经济性特征,其内在一致性也使得二者存在着相互借鉴的可能。在对美国资本主义经济法的借鉴过程中,要充分认识到经济法领域法律移植的重要性,选择适当的制度进行移植,并且在移植的过程中要注意本土化问题和适当的超前立法,为我国经济法法制现代化和社会主义和谐社会的建设做出贡献。
[Abstract]:China and the United States belong to different political systems and legal systems, and economic law also presents different characteristics, which is determined by the different historical development tracks and special historical background, cultural background and economic background of the two countries. However, the Chinese economic law as the socialist economic law is not completely different from the American economic law as the capitalist economic law. There are certain commonalities between them, which is determined by the inherent characteristics of the modern economic law. The purpose of this paper is to find out the commonness and difference between capitalist economic law and socialist economic law from the comparison of economic law between China and the United States, and to provide a theoretical reference for the reference of Chinese economic law to capitalist economic law. Specifically, the economic laws of China and the United States are produced in different modes, the degree of economic democracy and economic concentration is different, and the intensity of macro-control is not equal. However, both of them are modern economic law, and they are the coordination of the hands of the country and the head of the market, which embodies the characteristics of policy and economy, and their internal consistency also makes it possible for them to draw lessons from each other. In the process of drawing lessons from the American capitalist economic law, we should fully realize the importance of legal transplantation in the field of economic law, choose the appropriate system to transplant, and pay attention to the localization problem and appropriate advanced legislation in the process of transplantation. It contributes to the modernization of the legal system of economic law and the construction of a harmonious socialist society.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D971.2;D922.29
本文编号：2172227
[Abstract]:China and the United States belong to different political systems and legal systems, and economic law also presents different characteristics, which is determined by the different historical development tracks and special historical background, cultural background and economic background of the two countries. However, the Chinese economic law as the socialist economic law is not completely different from the American economic law as the capitalist economic law. There are certain commonalities between them, which is determined by the inherent characteristics of the modern economic law. The purpose of this paper is to find out the commonness and difference between capitalist economic law and socialist economic law from the comparison of economic law between China and the United States, and to provide a theoretical reference for the reference of Chinese economic law to capitalist economic law. Specifically, the economic laws of China and the United States are produced in different modes, the degree of economic democracy and economic concentration is different, and the intensity of macro-control is not equal. However, both of them are modern economic law, and they are the coordination of the hands of the country and the head of the market, which embodies the characteristics of policy and economy, and their internal consistency also makes it possible for them to draw lessons from each other. In the process of drawing lessons from the American capitalist economic law, we should fully realize the importance of legal transplantation in the field of economic law, choose the appropriate system to transplant, and pay attention to the localization problem and appropriate advanced legislation in the process of transplantation. It contributes to the modernization of the legal system of economic law and the construction of a harmonious socialist society.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D971.2;D922.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 唐立军;李书友;;建立和完善我国市场监管体系的思路、目标与措施[J];北京工商大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
2 赵静波;;浅论美国宏观调控法给我国的启示[J];太原城市职业技术学院学报;2008年10期
3 ;外国(地区)企业常驻机构登记管理的问题及对策[J];中国工商管理研究;2005年07期
4 郭曦;;20世纪90年代以来的美国宏观调控政策评述[J];价格月刊;2006年01期
5 侯平;周廉;张海波;;外籍人员个人所得税征管中存在的主要问题[J];经济研究参考;2006年79期
6 李胜利;;殊途同归的东西方经济法[J];经济法论丛;2008年02期
7 沈宗灵;论法律移植与比较法学[J];外国法译评;1995年01期
8 徐自强;外国企业常驻代表机构的税收征管存在问题的思考[J];扬州大学税务学院学报;2004年03期
9 朱小川;;金融危机中的美国立法——简评《紧急经济稳定法案》[J];中国金融;2008年22期
，本文编号：2172227
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2172227.html
