文本与现实间的裂罅——反思民初典制的表达与实践
发布时间:2018-08-13 09:15
【摘要】:民国初年典卖法适用《钦定大清现行刑律》与《清理不动产典当办法》的立法规定,但通过对比法律文本规定与民初典卖实践,会发现二者相悖之处甚多,制定法很多规定在实践中成为具文,而各地习俗中的一些内容也有悖于法律规定。在这种情形下,民初司法机关在司法实践中有时难以恪守法律条文,只能在法条与民意间作取舍或作调和。这一现象警示我们,习惯法乃人类社会法律的重要组成部分,法律多元现象有其存在的合理性,当代中国民事立法必须尊重社会内生之秩序。
[Abstract]:In the early period of the Republic of China, the current criminal law of Qing Dynasty and the method of clearing up the pawn on immovable property were applied to the law, but by comparing the legal texts with the practice of the book sale in the beginning of the Republic of China, it was found that there were many contradictions between the two. Many provisions of the statute law are written in practice, and some of the local customs are contrary to the law. In this case, judicial organs in the early Republic of China sometimes difficult to abide by the provisions of the law in judicial practice, can only make a choice or reconciliation between the law and public opinion. This phenomenon warns us that customary law is an important part of human social law, and the phenomenon of legal pluralism has its reasonableness. Civil legislation in contemporary China must respect the order of social endogeny.
【作者单位】: 阜阳师范学院政法学院;
【基金】:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“典卖制度研究——历史法学的视角”(13YJA820052)阶段性成果
【分类号】:D929
本文编号:2180541
[Abstract]:In the early period of the Republic of China, the current criminal law of Qing Dynasty and the method of clearing up the pawn on immovable property were applied to the law, but by comparing the legal texts with the practice of the book sale in the beginning of the Republic of China, it was found that there were many contradictions between the two. Many provisions of the statute law are written in practice, and some of the local customs are contrary to the law. In this case, judicial organs in the early Republic of China sometimes difficult to abide by the provisions of the law in judicial practice, can only make a choice or reconciliation between the law and public opinion. This phenomenon warns us that customary law is an important part of human social law, and the phenomenon of legal pluralism has its reasonableness. Civil legislation in contemporary China must respect the order of social endogeny.
【作者单位】: 阜阳师范学院政法学院;
【基金】:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“典卖制度研究——历史法学的视角”(13YJA820052)阶段性成果
【分类号】:D929
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李仁质;中国古代的狩猎典制[J];山西社会主义学院学报;1999年04期
2 吴秉坤;;典制的借债担保渊源——以民国时期徽州借贷契约为案例[J];合肥学院学报(社会科学版);2012年03期
3 定宜庄;《清代典制》读后[J];中国史研究动态;1994年06期
4 余煜刚;;传统典制在民国民法中的重述:结构、要素与话语[J];研究生法学;2012年01期
5 瞿见;;清中后期黔东南文斗寨苗族典制研究[J];民间法;2012年00期
6 吴向红;;典之风俗与典之法律——本土视域中的典制渊源[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年02期
7 张翔;;论典制习惯及其在成文民法上的重构[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2008年01期
8 吴秉坤;;典制的完整形态——清至民国徽州典契研究[J];淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年05期
9 邹亚莎;;从典制到典权的基本定型——民初大理院对传统典制的近代化改造[J];社会科学家;2014年08期
10 李学成;;清朝太监典制述论[J];满族研究;2012年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 评论员孙德宏 邋;必须让制假售假者“十年怕井绳”[N];工人日报;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 吴向红;典之风俗与典之法律[D];福建师范大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 赵楠楠;清代田宅典契初步研究[D];中国政法大学;2010年
,本文编号:2180541
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2180541.html