《大清新刑律》编纂过程中的立法权之争

发布时间：2018-08-17 10:01

【摘要】：以《大清新刑律》的编纂为视角,晚清新政中的立法权之争可分为两个阶段,第一阶段是修订法律大臣与法部、大理院关于法律起草权之争,第二阶段是宪政编查馆与资政院关于法律考核权与议决权之争。立法权之争的背后受到法政机构权力之争和礼法之争双重因素的影响。在权力之争中行政权虽然势大并试图控制立法权,但双方在一定程度上仍能够自我克制。论争明确了法政新机构的职能与权限关系,基本维持了晚清预备立宪的秩序,具有积极意义。法政机构的论争可以出现妥协结果的原因,在于更高权威的存在与法政新机构中关键人员的一身多职。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the compilation of the Great New Criminal Law, the struggle for legislative power in the New deal of the late Qing Dynasty can be divided into two stages. The first stage is the dispute between the Minister of Law and the Ministry of Law and the right to draft the law in Dali Institute. The second stage is the dispute between the Constitutional Inspection House and the Administrative Institute on the right of legal examination and the right of resolution. The struggle for legislative power is influenced by the dual factors of the power struggle of the legal institutions and the dispute of the etiquette law. In the struggle for power, the executive power is powerful and tries to control the legislative power, but both sides can restrain themselves to a certain extent. The controversy clarifies the relationship between the functions and powers of the new legal institutions and basically maintains the order of constitutionalism in the late Qing Dynasty, which is of positive significance. The reason for the controversy of the legal institutions is that the existence of higher authority and the key personnel in the new legal institutions have many duties.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;清华大学法学院近代法研究中心;
【基金】：笔者主持的国家社科基金项目“《大清新刑律》新研究及资料汇编”(13BFX015) 中国法学会项目“近代中国的法政论争研究”(2015D019)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D929

【相似文献】