道德难题中的法律判断——以“电车难题”为例
发布时间：2018-08-18 21:19
【摘要】：法律与道德一直是法学研究的核心问题之一,"电车难题"作为其中一桩著名的虚拟案例引发了公众与学界的广泛关注。针对该案存在三种不同观点,分别是琼斯女士杀一救五做法有罪,无罪以及在轨道上的六人都应受到惩罚,每种观点背后皆有各自的法律和道德理据支撑。一方面不应用简单的功利主义原则来解决道德难题,同时也不应简单地否定功利主义原则的合理性及其在现实生活中的积极作用。从对"电车难题"的探讨可以加深对法律与道德关系的认识与理解,进而为道德难题中法律的决疑提供有益的思路。
[Abstract]:Law and morality have always been one of the core problems in the study of law. As a famous virtual case, the tram puzzle has aroused wide public and academic attention. There are three different views on the case: Ms Jones is guilty of killing one man and five people are innocent and all six on the track should be punished, each with its own legal and moral justification. On the one hand, simple utilitarian principles should not be used to solve moral problems, and on the other hand, the rationality of utilitarianism principle and its positive role in real life should not be simply denied. The discussion of "tram puzzle" can deepen the understanding and understanding of the relationship between law and morality, and then provide a useful way of thinking for the determination of law in moral problems.
【作者单位】： 长春财经学院法学院;
【分类号】：D910
本文编号：2190711
[Abstract]:Law and morality have always been one of the core problems in the study of law. As a famous virtual case, the tram puzzle has aroused wide public and academic attention. There are three different views on the case: Ms Jones is guilty of killing one man and five people are innocent and all six on the track should be punished, each with its own legal and moral justification. On the one hand, simple utilitarian principles should not be used to solve moral problems, and on the other hand, the rationality of utilitarianism principle and its positive role in real life should not be simply denied. The discussion of "tram puzzle" can deepen the understanding and understanding of the relationship between law and morality, and then provide a useful way of thinking for the determination of law in moral problems.
【作者单位】： 长春财经学院法学院;
【分类号】：D910
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 赵义;;什么样的道德难题?[J];南风窗;2009年24期
2 钱永祥;;知识分子的道德难题[J];读书;2013年10期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 厦门大学法学院法律与认知神经科学研究中心、厦门大学知识论与认知科学研究中心 吴旭阳;“危难见真情”：道德难题中情感的功用[N];中国社会科学报;2013年
2 江山 高鲁剑;怎样破解未成年人网络道德难题？[N];中国审计报;2004年
3 江山 高鲁剑;未成年人，，面对网络道德难题[N];今日信息报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王平;媒体伦理的道德难题研究[D];西北师范大学;2010年
本文编号：2190711
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2190711.html
