霍姆斯的司法克制主义研究
发布时间：2018-08-27 15:56
【摘要】：霍姆斯积极司法克制主义的哲学基础在于美国本土的实用主义哲学。无论是其法律预测理论、规则解释理论,还是久负盛名的经验论,都充斥着实用主义的规则。他主张一般命题不能决定具体案件,主张司法审判必须回应社会需要、顺应社会情感。他反对僵化地适用法律,反对将法官看作立法机关的附庸和法律的代言人。在司法领域,法官一方面要遵循法律的逻辑进行分析和判断,推行规则之治;另一方面,在生活领域,法律逻辑的主导地位又悄然隐退,取而代之的是更加符合本地社会生活常识的生活逻辑对他们的影响力逐渐增加。这种司法路径,在一定程度上可以调动法律实施者的主观能动性,破除抱守陈规的机械态度,可以激励法律实施者积极运用法律而不是把法律理解为僵死的条文。通过对案件事实的经验性分析,对规则起到了价值补充和利益衡量的作用,有助于实现法律的一般正义与个案正义的有机结合。
[Abstract]:Holmes' philosophy of active judicial restraint is based on the pragmatic philosophy of the United States. Whether it is the theory of legal prediction, the theory of rule interpretation, or the famous theory of experience, it is full of practical rules. He holds that the general proposition cannot decide the specific case, and that the judicial trial must respond to the needs of the society and conform to the social emotion. He opposed the rigid application of the law and the perception of judges as vassals and spokesmen of the legislature. In the judicial field, on the one hand, judges should follow the logic of the law to analyze and judge, and carry out the rule of law; on the other hand, in the field of life, the dominant position of legal logic has quietly retired. Instead, the logic of life, which is more in line with the common sense of local life, is gaining influence over them. To a certain extent, this kind of judicial path can mobilize the subjective initiative of the legal executor, break the mechanical attitude of sticking to the rule of law, and can encourage the legal executor to apply the law actively rather than to interpret the law as a dead article. Through the empirical analysis of the facts of the case, it plays a role of value supplement and benefit measurement to the rule, and helps to realize the organic combination of general justice of law and justice of individual case.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D909.1
本文编号：2207748
[Abstract]:Holmes' philosophy of active judicial restraint is based on the pragmatic philosophy of the United States. Whether it is the theory of legal prediction, the theory of rule interpretation, or the famous theory of experience, it is full of practical rules. He holds that the general proposition cannot decide the specific case, and that the judicial trial must respond to the needs of the society and conform to the social emotion. He opposed the rigid application of the law and the perception of judges as vassals and spokesmen of the legislature. In the judicial field, on the one hand, judges should follow the logic of the law to analyze and judge, and carry out the rule of law; on the other hand, in the field of life, the dominant position of legal logic has quietly retired. Instead, the logic of life, which is more in line with the common sense of local life, is gaining influence over them. To a certain extent, this kind of judicial path can mobilize the subjective initiative of the legal executor, break the mechanical attitude of sticking to the rule of law, and can encourage the legal executor to apply the law actively rather than to interpret the law as a dead article. Through the empirical analysis of the facts of the case, it plays a role of value supplement and benefit measurement to the rule, and helps to realize the organic combination of general justice of law and justice of individual case.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D909.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 张之沧;从詹姆士到罗蒂的实用主义诠释[J];广西社会科学;2003年02期
2 陈金钊;法学的特点与研究的转向[J];求是学刊;2003年02期
3 曾德军;;从立法中心主义到司法中心主义的转变——关于法治另一条道路的思考[J];求索;2007年06期
4 刘练军;;在自制与能动之间——霍姆斯司法哲学刍议[J];法制与社会发展;2010年05期
5 赵红;美国的民族精神与实用主义哲学[J];榆林学院学报;2005年02期
6 范进学;冯静;;司法能动主义在中国:司法哲学之可能走向[J];云南大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
7 张颖玮;霍姆斯刑法思想评析[J];中国刑事法杂志;2001年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 马聪;霍姆斯现实主义法学思想研究[D];华东政法大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 徐希伟;霍姆斯司法哲学研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年
，本文编号：2207748
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2207748.html
