法伦理学：学科抑或思想
发布时间：2018-08-30 18:20
【摘要】：有关法伦理学的探讨在我国大陆地区已开展近三十年,然而其研究热度远不及以法社会学、法经济学为代表的众多边缘法学,探讨的内容也多局限于基础理论话题,少有独到的建树。学者们想要努力实现的是尽快建立起学科形态的法伦理学,他们从学科理论入手,生产了一批因缺少新颖的核心理念而难以符合人们预期的成果,这些理论成果在转化为具有法伦理学特质的学科内容时不可避免地遭遇瓶颈,法伦理学似乎陷入不知该向何处去的困境。本文从“如何构建法伦理学”的思考着手,从大陆学界的研究现状、其它法域相关领域的理论研究和实践出发,在分析和批判的基础上提出:大陆法伦理学研究困境的根源主要在于按照传统学科构建经验直接“创造”学科形态的法伦理学,忽略了它得以产生的理论和实践需要,造就了一门缺乏特色、难以贡献“知识增量”的“低价值学科”。文章的标题《法伦理学:学科抑或思想》正是对构建方式的问与答,提出法伦理学要走出困境就应当呼应理论和实践的现实需要,确定法伦理学独特的核心思想,在形成系统化的学说后再去构建学科,走一条“先思想,后学科”的道路。 文章的绪论部分从选题的角度对本论文选题的价值、研究目标、创新点等内容进行阐述,以向读者展示文章具体内容背后的思考,为全文的研究提供一个背景,帮助读者更好地理解文章具体内容编排和它们之间的关联。正文部分共八章四个部分,简略摘要如下。 第一部分是对已有研究成果的介绍和分析,对大陆法伦理学研究成果进行统计、分析和批判,对其它法域的法律伦理研究和实践进行介绍并与大陆展开对比,包括第一章“中国大陆法伦理学研究现状批判”和第二章“其它法域的法伦理学”。其中第一章是在对大陆研究现状进行统计分析的基础上,针对当前学界探讨得最为集中的三大话题的分析批判,对大陆法伦理学所面临窘境进行了描绘和基本的分析;第二章则将目光转向我国台湾地区的法律伦理学研究和实践,以及发展程度最高的美国法律伦理实践,从比较法的角度对这两个范本与大陆的研究展开对比,为大陆法伦理学的改进提供了一些借鉴。 第二部分是第一部分“破”的主调的继续深入,并尝试着去“立”一个全新的法伦理学构建模式,包括第三章“法伦理学创生的另一条路径”和第四章“作为一种思想的法伦理学”。其中第三章是第一、二章的继续深入,全面地分析了大陆法伦理学研究困境背后的原因,提出创生的恰当路径是“从思想到学科”;第四章则是对第三章所“立”理论的身体力行,解释作为一种思想的法伦理学的历史场景、明确了法伦理学的核心思想,并通过庞德提出的五个问题以及对思潮与历史场景互动的分析完成了法伦理学思想与西方三大法学思想的比较。 第三部分包括第五章“法伦理学研究的展开(一):从修正既有理论的角度”、第六章“法伦理学研究的展开(二):从分析社会问题的角度”和第七章“法伦理学研究的展开(三):从法律人伦理的角度”。该部分将法伦理学的核心思想放到既有理论、社会热点问题和法律人伦理探讨中去,让核心思想的种子在以上三个领域中萌发,是法伦理学从思想向学科过渡的第一步。 文章的第四部分是第八章“作为一门学科的法伦理学”。根据本文的基本观点,法伦理学的学科样态从思想样态进化而来的,在思想样态尚不能提供足够的素材、没有显现出基本理路的情形下,学科样态的法伦理学都不具备形成的条件,因此该部分的阐述实际上是对未来成熟阶段的法伦理学学科的设想。其中探讨了法伦理学学科存在的正当性、学科的定义、研究对象、学科归属和风格等对学科具有根本意义的话题,并提出了学科内容体系的基本构想。
[Abstract]:The study of legal ethics has been carried out in mainland China for nearly 30 years. However, its research enthusiasm is far less than that of many marginal jurisprudence represented by Sociology of law and economics of law. Neo-Confucianism, starting from the discipline theory, produces a number of results which are difficult to meet people's expectations because of the lack of novel core concepts. These theoretical results inevitably encounter bottlenecks when they are transformed into the content of the discipline with the characteristics of legal ethics. Legal ethics seems to fall into a predicament of not knowing where to go. On the basis of analysis and criticism, this paper puts forward that the root of the dilemma of the study of ethics of continental law lies in the construction of legal ethics which directly "creates" the form of the discipline according to the experience of traditional disciplines and neglects its production. The title of the article < Legal Ethics: Disciplines or Thoughts > is just a question and answer to the way of construction. It is proposed that legal ethics should respond to the practical needs of theory and practice to get out of the predicament and determine the unique characteristics of legal ethics. The core idea is to construct a discipline after forming a systematic theory and follow the road of "thinking first, disciplines later".
The introduction part of the article elaborates the value, research goal and innovation of the topic from the angle of topic selection, in order to show the readers the thinking behind the specific content of the article, provide a background for the full text research, and help readers better understand the specific content of the article and the relationship between them. The four part is a brief summary.
The first part is the introduction and analysis of the existing research results, the statistics, analysis and criticism of the research results of Continental Law Ethics, the introduction and comparison of the research and practice of legal ethics in other jurisdictions with the mainland, including the first chapter "Criticism of the status quo of the study of legal ethics in mainland China" and the second chapter "Falun in other jurisdictions" In the first chapter, on the basis of the statistical analysis of the current research situation in mainland China, the dilemma faced by the ethics of continental law is described and analyzed in the light of the analysis and criticism of the three most intensive topics discussed by the current academic circles. Practice, as well as the most developed legal ethics practice in the United States, compares the two models with the mainland from the perspective of comparative law, providing some reference for the improvement of continental law ethics.
The second part is the continuation of the main tone of the first part, and attempts to "establish" a new mode of legal ethics construction, including the third chapter "another path to the creation of legal ethics" and the fourth chapter "legal ethics as a thought". The third chapter is the continuation of the first and second chapters, a comprehensive analysis. The reasons behind the dilemma of the study of the ethics of civil law put forward that the proper path of creation is "from thought to discipline"; the fourth chapter is the practice of the theory "established" in the third chapter, explaining the historical scene of the ethics of law as a kind of thought, clarifying the core ideas of the ethics of law, and through Pound's five questions and the corresponding. The analysis of the interaction between the trend of thought and the historical scene has completed the comparison between the legal ethics thought and the western three legal thoughts.
The third part includes the fifth chapter, "the development of the study of legal ethics (1): from the perspective of revising the existing theory), the sixth chapter,"the development of the study of legal ethics (2): from the perspective of analyzing social problems"and the seventh chapter"the development of the study of legal ethics (3): from the perspective of legal ethics". It is the first step for the transition of legal ethics from ideology to discipline to let the seeds of core ideas germinate in the above three fields in the discussion of existing theories, social hot issues and legal ethics.
According to the basic point of view of this article, the subject pattern of legal ethics has evolved from the thought pattern, but it can not provide enough material, and does not show the basic principle, so the legal ethics of the subject pattern does not have the conditions to form. Therefore, the elaboration of this part is actually an assumption of the discipline of legal ethics in the future mature stage. It discusses the legitimacy of the existence of the discipline of legal ethics, the definition of the discipline, the object of study, the attribution and style of the discipline, and puts forward the basic conception of the content system of the discipline.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90-053
本文编号：2213910
[Abstract]:The study of legal ethics has been carried out in mainland China for nearly 30 years. However, its research enthusiasm is far less than that of many marginal jurisprudence represented by Sociology of law and economics of law. Neo-Confucianism, starting from the discipline theory, produces a number of results which are difficult to meet people's expectations because of the lack of novel core concepts. These theoretical results inevitably encounter bottlenecks when they are transformed into the content of the discipline with the characteristics of legal ethics. Legal ethics seems to fall into a predicament of not knowing where to go. On the basis of analysis and criticism, this paper puts forward that the root of the dilemma of the study of ethics of continental law lies in the construction of legal ethics which directly "creates" the form of the discipline according to the experience of traditional disciplines and neglects its production. The title of the article < Legal Ethics: Disciplines or Thoughts > is just a question and answer to the way of construction. It is proposed that legal ethics should respond to the practical needs of theory and practice to get out of the predicament and determine the unique characteristics of legal ethics. The core idea is to construct a discipline after forming a systematic theory and follow the road of "thinking first, disciplines later".
The introduction part of the article elaborates the value, research goal and innovation of the topic from the angle of topic selection, in order to show the readers the thinking behind the specific content of the article, provide a background for the full text research, and help readers better understand the specific content of the article and the relationship between them. The four part is a brief summary.
The first part is the introduction and analysis of the existing research results, the statistics, analysis and criticism of the research results of Continental Law Ethics, the introduction and comparison of the research and practice of legal ethics in other jurisdictions with the mainland, including the first chapter "Criticism of the status quo of the study of legal ethics in mainland China" and the second chapter "Falun in other jurisdictions" In the first chapter, on the basis of the statistical analysis of the current research situation in mainland China, the dilemma faced by the ethics of continental law is described and analyzed in the light of the analysis and criticism of the three most intensive topics discussed by the current academic circles. Practice, as well as the most developed legal ethics practice in the United States, compares the two models with the mainland from the perspective of comparative law, providing some reference for the improvement of continental law ethics.
The second part is the continuation of the main tone of the first part, and attempts to "establish" a new mode of legal ethics construction, including the third chapter "another path to the creation of legal ethics" and the fourth chapter "legal ethics as a thought". The third chapter is the continuation of the first and second chapters, a comprehensive analysis. The reasons behind the dilemma of the study of the ethics of civil law put forward that the proper path of creation is "from thought to discipline"; the fourth chapter is the practice of the theory "established" in the third chapter, explaining the historical scene of the ethics of law as a kind of thought, clarifying the core ideas of the ethics of law, and through Pound's five questions and the corresponding. The analysis of the interaction between the trend of thought and the historical scene has completed the comparison between the legal ethics thought and the western three legal thoughts.
The third part includes the fifth chapter, "the development of the study of legal ethics (1): from the perspective of revising the existing theory), the sixth chapter,"the development of the study of legal ethics (2): from the perspective of analyzing social problems"and the seventh chapter"the development of the study of legal ethics (3): from the perspective of legal ethics". It is the first step for the transition of legal ethics from ideology to discipline to let the seeds of core ideas germinate in the above three fields in the discussion of existing theories, social hot issues and legal ethics.
According to the basic point of view of this article, the subject pattern of legal ethics has evolved from the thought pattern, but it can not provide enough material, and does not show the basic principle, so the legal ethics of the subject pattern does not have the conditions to form. Therefore, the elaboration of this part is actually an assumption of the discipline of legal ethics in the future mature stage. It discusses the legitimacy of the existence of the discipline of legal ethics, the definition of the discipline, the object of study, the attribution and style of the discipline, and puts forward the basic conception of the content system of the discipline.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90-053
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贺欣;;转型中国背景下的法律与社会科学研究[J];北大法律评论;2005年02期
2 成凡;;社会科学“包装”法学?——它的社会科学含义[J];北大法律评论;2005年02期
3 严存生;近现代西方法与道德关系之争[J];比较法研究;2000年02期
4 胡旭晟;东方宗教法概观——以法律伦理学和历史的理论逻辑为视角[J];比较法研究;1997年03期
5 温俊达;;法伦理学及其基本问题[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2010年13期
6 陈忠海;;论档案立法原则的伦理精神[J];档案学通讯;2008年03期
7 罗红艳;;关注弱者权利:基于政府与学校法律纠纷的法律伦理思考[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年04期
8 王进喜;中国律师职业道德:历史回顾与展望[J];中国司法;2005年02期
9 王玮;当代中国法伦理学研究中的几个问题——第三次“北京应用伦理学论坛”综述[J];道德与文明;2004年06期
10 周慧;;法律的道德审视的可能性[J];道德与文明;2007年04期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 罗能生;财产权利与伦理选择[D];湖南师范大学;2002年
2 尹伟中;侦查程序中的人权保护与伦理反思[D];湖南师范大学;2003年
3 周慧;法律的道德之维[D];湖南师范大学;2008年
4 缪斌;社会转型期我国公务员职务犯罪的道德调控研究[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
5 吴真文;法律与道德的界限[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨曦希;完善我国“交强险”制度的理性思考[D];苏州大学;2010年
2 李静然;论刑事诉讼伦理观的构建[D];中国政法大学;2005年
3 程敏;论法伦理学的基本问题[D];安徽师范大学;2005年
4 李昕;法律伦理学视野中的民法诚信原则[D];南京理工大学;2005年
5 戎魏魏;论建筑物区分所有权之行使[D];华南师范大学;2007年
6 付振华;对中国体育社团处罚的伦理考量[D];湖南师范大学;2009年
7 曹亚琦;见义勇为立法的法伦理学分析[D];湘潭大学;2009年
8 胡菡子;我国事业单位社会养老保险立法研究[D];西南大学;2010年
9 刘闻敏;关于禁止近亲结婚规定的法理学思考[D];安徽大学;2010年
10 刘亚军;许霆案的定罪规范分析和量刑多维考察[D];西南政法大学;2010年
，本文编号：2213910
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2213910.html
