司法裁判结果责任的古今之辨——以《红楼梦》自杀事件的解读为例

发布时间：2018-09-01 08:13

【摘要】：因不法行为引起自杀是刑法理论和司法实践的疑难问题,在我国刑事司法解释和判例中,往往会被作为犯罪的构成、加重或从重情节处罚。我国明清例律对该问题有着鲜明独特的裁判立场。在清代司法判例的视野下,《红楼梦》里有代表性的四个引起自杀案例一般会得出肯定归责的结论。但从当今刑法理论的因果关系、责任主义和被害人责任等视角来审视,有的则得出了相反的结论。这其中的关键问题是对刑法的责任主义原则的悖反。以小说中的案例研读刑法问题,生动易懂且不失深刻。当前我国刑事司法实践中对引起自杀行为的处罚同样存在与刑法理论相悖反的结果归责倾向,应当避免。
[Abstract]:Suicide caused by illegal acts is a difficult problem in criminal law theory and judicial practice. In our country's criminal judicial interpretation and precedents, it is often regarded as the constitution of a crime, aggravated or punished according to the serious circumstances. Four suicide cases generally lead to the conclusion of affirmative attribution of responsibility. However, from the perspective of contemporary criminal law theory, such as causality, accountability and victim responsibility, some of them come to the opposite conclusion. The key problem is the violation of the principle of criminal liability. It is easy to understand and profound. In the current criminal judicial practice of our country, the punishment for causing suicide also exists the tendency of imputation of consequences which is contrary to the criminal law theory and should be avoided.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】：D929

【相似文献】