情理与法理:当代中国容隐制度法律定位探析
[Abstract]:Relative concealment system has existed for a long time at all times and in modern times. It is an institutional stipulation that the law recognizes and protects the concealment behavior in a certain range. From ancient generation, existence, development to modern, the vitality is so strong and enduring, it must have the reasonable foundation of existence. But in contemporary China, because of various reasons, the current law negates the traditional ethical legislation of "closeness between relatives and relatives" and at the same time does not establish a modern concealment system based on the rights of relatives. The absence of concealment system reflects a negative legal evaluation of the behavior of concealment among relatives both in the substantive field and in the field of litigation procedure. This traditional and modern artificial blockade will inevitably lead to a series of social and legal adverse effects and consequences. Therefore, through the demonstration of concealment behavior and the rationality of the concealment system, and the analysis of the negative consequences of the absence of the concealment system in contemporary China, the author thinks that no matter the rationality of the theoretical perspective, Or proceeding from the actual needs of the present society, we should reflect on and construct the legislative status quo of the absence of the implicit system in our country. The system of tolerance and concealment, which is both ancient and modern, can regain its vitality in our country, and play its due role as a legal system in constructing a harmonious socialist society with Chinese characteristics and in a society governed by law. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the social basis of implicit behavior. The author thinks that the exploration of certain behavior should be the starting point and premise of the legal system. Therefore, in this part, the author tries to apply some basic theories of humanology, social family science and ethics to the analysis of the occurrence of concealment behavior, which is mainly driven by the love instinct of relatives in human nature. The need to maintain the intimate relationship of the family and the requirements of human ethics to demonstrate the reasons for people's concealment behavior after the relatives commit crimes. The second part is the modern legal basis of the existence of the concealment system. As a legal system to adjust the concealment behavior, the existence of the concealment system in the modern society of rule of law is bound to contain the legal basis. In this part, mainly from the moral nature of law and ethical immunity, The basic value pursuit of modern law and the restriction of the state power in the society of rule of law are three angles to demonstrate the legal basis of the legal institutionalization of the concealment behavior. The third part is the legal basis of the tolerance system in the society of the rule of law. The vacancy in Chinese law and its negative consequences. In this part, the author first investigates the actual situation of the absence of substantive law and procedural law in the contemporary concealment system of our country, and then analyzes the influence of the absence of this system on the individual, family, society and country in contemporary China. The fourth part is the concealment system in modern law and its orientation in contemporary China. In this part, the author first summarizes the embodiment and basic characteristics of the concealment system in modern law, and then analyzes the necessity and feasibility of establishing the concealment system in contemporary China. Finally, the author makes some tentative ideas about the legal orientation and concrete construction of the tolerance system in contemporary China.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D929;D924
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭小亮;;论容隐制度的回归路径[J];法制与社会;2008年16期
2 赵春凤;论在我国法律体系中重新确立容隐制度[J];检察实践;2005年02期
3 白玉博;论我国容隐制度及其现实意义[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2004年05期
4 段灵芝;;和谐社会中容隐制的重构[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2006年02期
5 李海荣;;法本无情亦有情——对“亲属容隐”和“春秋决狱”的思考[J];法制与社会;2007年09期
6 康宇;;试论“亲亲相隐”与中国古代司法制度[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年01期
7 易锦媛;;中国法制史上的“亲亲相隐”制度及其重构与完善[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2007年05期
8 齐乐;;秩序的人性基础:古代容隐制度的价值分析[J];内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
9 傅庆涛;容隐制度的现代法律价值分析[J];政法论丛;2003年02期
10 李金娟;“亲亲相为隐”制度的法律价值分析[J];中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年S2期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 李晓芳;;浅谈亲亲相隐制度[A];当代法学论坛(二0一一年第三辑)[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 张遇哲;不再鼓励“大义灭亲”是一种进步[N];贵州民族报;2011年
2 本报记者 郭士辉 卢宗光 何晓慧;开创两岸司法互信合作新机制[N];人民法院报;2009年
3 洪丹;“亲亲相隐”的突破口[N];南方日报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 黄晓权;刑事证据制度的伦理审视[D];中南大学;2012年
2 肖晚祥;期待可能性理论研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 白梅;重构我国刑事法律中的亲属容隐制度[D];中国政法大学;2010年
2 陈伟奇;中国古代刑法亲属容隐制探析[D];西南政法大学;2010年
3 杨怡悦;亲属容隐立法的类型化分析[D];中国政法大学;2011年
4 王芳;刑事容隐制度研究[D];湖南大学;2010年
5 赵婷;容隐制度探析[D];山东大学;2011年
6 曾德伟;浅析中国古代容隐制度及其现代价值[D];华东政法大学;2010年
7 杜国玮;谈历史上的容隐制度及其对现代刑法的影响[D];中国政法大学;2011年
8 李昆;情理与法理:当代中国容隐制度法律定位探析[D];西南政法大学;2011年
9 齐乐;古代容隐制度的法理分析及当代借鉴[D];中南民族大学;2011年
10 谢晓珍;论容隐制度的缺失与回归[D];华东政法大学;2012年
,本文编号:2217635
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2217635.html