唯物辩证法视野下法律论证证立标准研究

发布时间：2018-09-11 14:25

【摘要】：随着人们对法律方法的关注度不断提高,法律论证理论作为一个重要的研究领域也在不断发展并取得重要地位。但是,在我国,对法律论证的研究还是近年来的事情,法律论证作为寻求法治合法性的一种理论追求,承载着一项重要使命,即寻求达致司法公正、实现社会正义之方法,法律论证的出现及合理运用增强了司法裁决的合理性和可接受性,作为近几年的研究热点问题,一个科学、合理的论证体系在很大程度上决定着法律论证能否充分发挥其功能。本文以唯物辩证法为视角,在探讨法律论证一般理论的基础上,以司法实践中判决的可接受性为导向,对法律论证的研究进路、运行模式等进行分析,为构建可接受的法律论证体系奠定理论基础。唯物辩证法作为认识世界最普遍的方法,唯物辩证法规律是自然和人类社会发展的规律也是认识的规律。在对可接受的法律论证体系构建过程中起着重要的作用,主要体现在唯物辩证法规律在对法律事实的证立、法律规范的证立以及对二者之间的一致性的证立过程中的作用。法律论证的目的就是为司法裁判提供可接受的理由,一个司法判决要能够被人们所接受,必须具备客观性,而客观性的实现需要在法律事实的真、法律规范的正当性以及合法律性三个方面来体现。本文致力于马克思主义哲学和法学的融合,在司法过程中构建一个客观的法律论证证立标准,通过运用论证方法,实现个案裁判之公正,彰显法治之目标。这对于法律论证贯彻于司法实践有一定的积极意义。
[Abstract]:With the increasing attention to legal methods, the theory of legal argumentation, as an important research field, has been developing and gaining an important position. However, in our country, the research on legal argumentation is still a matter of recent years. As a theoretical pursuit of seeking legitimacy of the rule of law, legal argumentation carries an important mission, that is, to seek a way to achieve judicial justice and social justice. The appearance and reasonable application of legal argumentation enhance the rationality and acceptability of judicial adjudication. As a hot research issue in recent years, a scientific and reasonable system of argumentation determines to a great extent whether legal argumentation can give full play to its function. Based on the general theory of legal argumentation and the acceptability of judgment in judicial practice, this paper, from the perspective of materialist dialectics, analyzes the research approach and operation mode of legal argumentation. It lays a theoretical foundation for the construction of an acceptable system of legal argumentation. Materialist dialectics is the most common method of understanding the world, and the law of materialist dialectics is the law of the development of nature and human society as well as the law of cognition. It plays an important role in the construction of acceptable legal argumentation system, which is mainly embodied in the role of materialist dialectics in the process of establishing legal facts, legal norms and the consistency between them. The purpose of legal argumentation is to provide acceptable reasons for the administration of justice. In order to be accepted by people, a judicial decision must be objective, and the realization of objectivity needs to be based on the truth of legal facts. The legitimacy and conformity of legal norms are embodied in three aspects. This paper is devoted to the fusion of Marxist philosophy and jurisprudence, and constructs an objective standard of legal argumentation in the course of judicature. By using the method of argumentation, we can realize the justice of case adjudication and highlight the goal of rule by law. This has certain positive significance for legal argumentation to carry out in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：浙江理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90-051

【参考文献】