中美房地产经纪管理法律制度比较研究
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, real estate brokers ushered in historic opportunities for development. Its rapid development not only provides great convenience for consumers to buy and lease real estate, but also helps to reduce the development risk of developers, save social transaction costs, prosper and enliven the real estate market, and promote the circulation of real estate. Real estate agents become the lubricant necessary for the operation of this large machine in the real estate market. However, in the process of the rapid development of real estate brokers, the laws and regulations on real estate brokers show serious lag and vacancy, which makes real estate brokers lack of legal protection and constraints, and exposes many deficiencies in management. It affects the healthy development of the real estate brokerage industry, breeds a series of social problems, such as lack of credit, and brings serious harm to the credibility of the real estate brokerage industry. In order to solve these problems, many scholars began to study the perfect legal system of real estate brokerage management in the United States, trying to learn from the experience of the legal system of American real estate brokerage management, but the effect was not good. Because of the lack of a real and systematic study of the legal system of real estate brokerage management in the United States and the feasibility of its application in China, most of the theoretical studies are still comparative studies from the perspectives of economics and management. The research on legal issues is scattered in other research areas, few from the perspective of law to the legal system of real estate brokerage management in China and the United States, a special system of comparative research. Therefore, this paper intends to study the real estate brokerage management in the United States from the legal point of view, and combining with the actual situation in China, compares the legal system of real estate broker management between China and the United States, and puts forward some suggestions that China can use for reference to the American model.
【学位授予单位】:贵州民族学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:F293.3;D922.181;D971.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 段枚焱;中美房产经纪漫谈[J];北京房地产;2003年10期
2 刘鹏忠;我国房地产经纪企业发展的六大趋势[J];城市开发;2000年04期
3 刘长滨,都昌满;中美房地产经纪业发展及管理制度比较[J];城市开发;2002年01期
4 包航;;房地产经纪中介行业管理浅析[J];产业与科技论坛;2007年07期
5 吴德夫;美国房地产中介事务中的法律关系[J];中国房地产;1994年09期
6 姜明和;建立规范统一的房地产经纪人制度——美国房地产经纪人制度访后感[J];中国房地产;1998年09期
7 黄英 ,刘洪玉;中国房地产经纪服务业的现状与发展[J];中国房地产;2004年09期
8 李贵良;中国房地产经纪行业管理模式的合理选择[J];中国房地产;2005年05期
9 廖俊平;;对我国房地产经纪人管理体制的一些思考[J];中国房地产;2007年02期
10 焦胜利;发展房地产中介服务业的制度建设研究[J];华东经济管理;2005年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 ;附录B 中国房地产估价师与房地产经纪人学会简介[A];房地产经纪行业发展报告[C];2010年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 陈英存;我国房地产经纪业管理模式研究[D];同济大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 胡珂;我国房地产经纪业的现状分析和对策研究[D];重庆大学;2003年
2 温淼;房地产经纪市场法律规制研究[D];西南政法大学;2005年
3 郭星;房地产经纪业法律问题研究[D];华侨大学;2007年
4 黎卓敏;广州市的房地产经纪管理研究[D];北京交通大学;2008年
5 刘元涛;房地产经纪监管法律制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2009年
6 李侃;中美房地产经纪运作模式的比较研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:2263172
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2263172.html