增资补充协议中股权回购条款的效力认定

发布时间：2018-11-01 17:00

【摘要】：随着经济的发展,我国资本市场日渐活跃。各类市场主体或是为了扩大市场占有率;或是为了公司财务需要,各种资本运作形式,诸如并购、重组、上市等得到广泛的应用。对赌协议作为投资方与融资方对企业未来估值不确定的一种调整协议,在相关资本运作中拥有广阔的应用前景。而在司法实务中,围绕对赌协议的争议从未停止。本文通过叙述A投资基金与B集团、C公司、D公司、E公司股东增资回购纠纷一案,结合有关理论对本案所涉及的争议焦点进行分析。第一部分主要是陈述基本案情,并提出案件争议焦点。第二部分围绕本案争议焦点展开分析。首先,结合相关理论及本案实际情况确认增资补充协议中的股权回购条款为对赌协议。其次,对增资补充协议中股权回购条款的效力认定问题进行分析。第三部分针对对赌协议在我国的应用现状提出了笔者的几点建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, China's capital market is becoming more and more active. All kinds of market entities are to enlarge the market share, or for the financial needs of the company, various forms of capital operation, such as mergers and acquisitions, reorganization, listing and so on, are widely used. As an adjustment agreement between investors and financiers in the future valuation of enterprises, the gambling agreement has a broad application prospect in the operation of related capital. But in the judicial practice, the dispute over the gambling agreement never stops. This paper analyzes the dispute focus of A investment fund with B group, C company, D company and E company by describing the case of the dispute between A investment fund and B group, C company, D company and E company. The first part mainly states the basic facts of the case and puts forward the dispute focus of the case. The second part focuses on the focus of the case. First of all, combining the relevant theory and the actual situation of this case, confirm that the equity repurchase clause in the supplementary agreement is a gambling agreement. Secondly, it analyzes the validity of the equity repurchase clause in the supplementary agreement. The third part puts forward some suggestions on the application of gambling agreement in our country.
【学位授予单位】：西南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.287

【相似文献】