当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

法律方法研究的实践面向

发布时间:2018-11-01 18:46
【摘要】:21世纪以来,法律方法受到了学界的普遍关注,法律方法研究呈蓬勃发展之势。然而,一方面,学界有关法律方法问题的探讨逐渐呈现出两种不同的研究进路,造成了法律方法研究“实践面向”或者“理论面向”的困惑:其一为对有关法律实践工作方式方法的经验、原理和理论的系统研究,其二为对西方法学方法论与法哲学思想的哲理化研究;另一方面,与法律方法研究的方兴未艾形成反差的是,从现有的研究成果看,国内鲜有从从宏观立场上对该研究领域进行归纳和反思。本文将立足国内已有的法律方法研究成果,梳理、总结国内法律方法研究的名称争议和研究对象变迁历程,进而归纳并阐述法律方法研究的立场和定位在于其实践面向。 第一部分,问题的提出。主要介绍选题背景和研究现状,并交待本文需要论述与回答的问题。 第二部分,从概念的形成看法律方法研究的实践面向。由于研究角度和方法不尽相同,国内学者对“法律方法”的概念有着不同的认识。本部分通过对“法律方法”这一概念形成的过程阐明:从“法本体”中剥离出“法学方法”,从“法学方法”剥离出“法律方法”,再从“法律方法”中剥离“法律方法论”,这一过程,是法律方法研究逐步实现实践面向的过程。 第三部分,从研究对象的变迁看法律方法研究的实践面向。我国的法律方法研究是从法律解释开始的,在21世纪后学界对多种法律方法进行了深入的研究,近两年来部分法律方法研究者结合法律实践在新的领域展开了法律方法研究。本部分通过对法律方法研究对象变迁的评述阐明:从法律解释到多种法律方法,再到近两年来法律方法研究的新领域,法律方法研究对象变迁的历史是逐步实现实践面向的历史。 第四部分,法律方法研究如何深化实践面向。本部分分别从立足我国法律制度的法律方法研究、加强法学家与法律家的联系、注重法学教育中的法律方法训练等三个方面,展开论述法律方法研究应当如何坚持其实践面向的立场定位,以完成其面向实践、回应实践的理论使命。
[Abstract]:Since the 21 st century, the legal method has received the universal attention of the academic circles, the legal method research presents the vigorous development tendency. However, on the one hand, there are two different approaches to the study of legal methods in academic circles. This has led to the confusion of "practice-oriented" or "theory-oriented" in the study of legal methods: first, a systematic study of the experience, principles and theories of the methods of working in legal practice, The second is to study the philosophy of western law methodology and philosophy of law. On the other hand, in contrast to the rising research on legal methods, from the existing research results, there are few from the macro point of view to summarize and reflect on the research field. This article will base on the domestic legal method research achievement, combs, summarizes the domestic legal method research name dispute and the research object vicissitude, then induces and explains the legal method research stand and the localization lies in its practice face. The first part is the raising of the question. This paper mainly introduces the background and research status of the topic, and explains the questions that need to be discussed and answered in this paper. The second part, from the formation of the concept to see the practice of legal methods. Because the research angle and method are different, domestic scholars have different understanding of the concept of "legal method". This part clarifies the process of forming the concept of "legal method": stripping "legal method" from "legal Noumenon", "legal method" from "legal method", and "legal Methodology" from "legal method". This process, is the legal method research step by step realization of practice oriented process. The third part, from the change of the object of study to see the practice of legal methods. The study of legal method in our country begins with the interpretation of law. After the 21st century, many kinds of legal methods have been deeply studied in academic circles. In the past two years, some researchers of legal methods have carried out research on legal methods in new fields combined with the practice of law. This part expounds the changes of the research object of legal method: from legal interpretation to various legal methods, and then to the new field of legal method research in the last two years. The history of the vicissitude of the object of study of legal method is the history of realizing the practice gradually. The fourth part, the legal method research how to deepen the practice face. In this part, the author studies the legal methods based on the legal system of our country, strengthens the connection between jurists and jurists, and pays attention to the training of legal methods in legal education. In order to fulfill its theoretical mission of facing practice and responding to practice, the research on legal method should stick to its position of facing practice.
【学位授予单位】:华南理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D90

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 孔小红;法律解释的理论和实践[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1988年03期

2 胡兴东;;中国古代判例法模式研究——以元清两朝为中心[J];北方法学;2010年01期

3 汪庆红;;地方立法监督实证研究:体制与程序[J];北方法学;2010年06期

4 张利春;;法学家的方法论研究对法律实务家的影响——以日本的经验为视角[J];比较法研究;2009年01期

5 罗智敏;;从邓玉娇案看民众“干预”司法的若干问题[J];比较法研究;2009年06期

6 黄文艺;;论法学方法论的几个问题[J];当代法学;1993年04期

7 马朱炎;我国社会主义法律解释原则[J];西北政法学院学报;1987年02期

8 解兴权;法律推理的涵义、性质及其功能[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1998年06期

9 陶凯元;中国法律解释制度现状之剖析[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;1999年06期

10 葛洪义;试论法律论证的源流与旨趣[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年05期



本文编号:2304778

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2304778.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户84722***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com