案件事实的归属论证

发布时间：2018-11-01 19:30

【摘要】：案件事实的归属论证是司法裁判说理的灵魂所在。它主要是为了打通事实与法律之间的屏障,解决案件事实能否归属于法律规则构成要件之下的说理难题。当前,涵摄模式与等置模式在归属论证方面均存在难以克服的缺陷。可以在汲取它们各自优势的基础上,根据可普遍化公理,对归属论证模式进行重新建构,确立事实论证与价值论证的递进式符合模式,以及相应的论述型式论证规范和"事实解释在先,价值解释在后"的法律解释原理。递进式符合模式具体表述为:若能够证明待决案件事实与构成要件指陈的要件事实在事实特征上相符合,则应当把案件事实归属在构成要件之下;事实特征无法证明相符合,就应当递进到对案件事实的价值判断是否符合法律规则的价值预设的证明:若符合,便将案件事实归属在构成要件之下,反之则不予归属。
[Abstract]:The attribution of the facts of the case is the soul of the reasoning of the judicial judgment. It is mainly in order to break through the barrier between fact and law and to solve the problem of whether the facts of a case can be classified under the constitutive elements of legal rules. At present, both the inclusive mode and the equiposition mode are difficult to overcome. On the basis of absorbing their respective advantages and according to the generalizable axiom, we can re-construct the mode of attribution argument, and establish the progressive mode of conformity between the fact argument and the value argument. And the corresponding argumentation standard and the legal interpretation principle of "the fact explanation comes first, the value explanation comes later". The progressive mode of conformity is described as follows: if it can be proved that the facts of the pending case are consistent with the facts of the elements indicated by the constituent elements, then the facts of the case should be classified under the constitutive elements; If the characteristics of the facts can not be proved to be consistent with each other, the judgment of the value of the facts of the case should be gradually proved to be in accordance with the value presupposition of the legal rules: if so, the facts of the case will be classified under the constitutive elements, otherwise, the facts will not be assigned.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90-051

【相似文献】