当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

城市规划中的公共利益:美国司法案例解释中的逻辑与含义

发布时间:2018-11-22 17:41
【摘要】:公共利益是城市规划的中心议题,是政府干预土地使用的依据。然而,如何界定公共利益一直是学界争论的焦点。本文从美国司法审查的判例中探讨城市规划中的公共利益。从美国的司法案例上看,私有产权保护不是绝对的,并且公共利益的概念也是扩展性的。公共利益是在特定社会场景中经过审慎的综合考量的比较利益。这种审慎的综合考量的逻辑包含了公共目的、正当程序和利益衡量。一个经过审慎考量的公平、公正的城市规划本身就是公共利益。
[Abstract]:Public interest is the central issue of urban planning and the basis for government intervention in land use. However, how to define the public interest has always been the focus of academic controversy. This paper discusses the public interest in urban planning from the jurisprudence of judicial review in the United States. In American judicial cases, the protection of private property rights is not absolute, and the concept of public interest is extensible. Public interest is a comparative interest that is carefully considered in a particular social context. The logic of this prudent and comprehensive consideration encompasses public purposes, due process, and interest measures. A carefully considered fair and just urban planning is itself in the public interest.
【作者单位】: 杭州市政协城建环资委;
【分类号】:D971.2;TU984

【相似文献】

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 本报首席记者 朱幸福;两起官司给在巴西中资企业的警示[N];文汇报;2014年



本文编号:2350090

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2350090.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f5a1f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com