第二次的相逢——论外国法研究的历史转向及其中国问题意识
发布时间:2018-11-26 08:56
【摘要】:"外国法的某某制度及其对中国的启示",是法学论文写作中常见的一种思维定势。这种思维方式,错把中西之间价值中性的差异处理为有着价值位阶之落差的差距,由此形成了向西方寻求药方的学徒心态。为了克服这一弊病,我们应当自觉地追求外国法研究的历史转向,呈现出法律的复杂性以及法律发展过程的偶然性和开放性。在此意义上,有自觉时间意识的外法史研究,就成为了法理学谱系内的"批判法学"。通过对法律制度及其形成和流变之历史语境的深描,我们可以完成对此前被神化的某些法律概念和学说的祛魅,从而让我们摆脱制度拜物教和概念法学的禁锢,直面中国法律发展的事实。
[Abstract]:The system of foreign law and its enlightenment to China is a common thinking pattern in the writing of legal papers. This mode of thinking wrongly treats the neutral difference in value between China and the West as the difference of value rank, thus forming the apprenticeship mentality of seeking medicine from the West. In order to overcome this shortcoming, we should consciously pursue the historical turn of the study of foreign law, showing the complexity of the law and the chance and openness of the legal development process. In this sense, the study of the history of external law with conscious consciousness of time has become a critical law in the pedigree of jurisprudence. Through the deep description of the legal system and the historical context of its formation and evolution, we can disenchantment some legal concepts and doctrines which were deified before, so that we can get rid of the imprison of institutional fetishism and conceptual jurisprudence. Face up to the facts of the development of Chinese law.
【作者单位】: 华东师范大学法学院;
【分类号】:D90-2
本文编号:2358053
[Abstract]:The system of foreign law and its enlightenment to China is a common thinking pattern in the writing of legal papers. This mode of thinking wrongly treats the neutral difference in value between China and the West as the difference of value rank, thus forming the apprenticeship mentality of seeking medicine from the West. In order to overcome this shortcoming, we should consciously pursue the historical turn of the study of foreign law, showing the complexity of the law and the chance and openness of the legal development process. In this sense, the study of the history of external law with conscious consciousness of time has become a critical law in the pedigree of jurisprudence. Through the deep description of the legal system and the historical context of its formation and evolution, we can disenchantment some legal concepts and doctrines which were deified before, so that we can get rid of the imprison of institutional fetishism and conceptual jurisprudence. Face up to the facts of the development of Chinese law.
【作者单位】: 华东师范大学法学院;
【分类号】:D90-2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 伊翁·露苏阿思;皮埃尔·布莱尔;张亚非;;适用外国法的根据和条件[J];环球法律评论;1983年06期
2 何勤华;;外国法教学和研究的现状及改革意见[J];现代法学;1987年03期
3 王瀚;试论外国法不能查明的确认和补救[J];法学杂志;1997年06期
4 杨联华;;日本移植外国法的历史经验[J];外国法制史研究;2000年00期
5 朱景文;国内司法中运用外国法的比较法思考[J];法学;2004年01期
6 霍政欣;;美国法院查明外国法之考察[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期
7 林彦;杨珍;;美国联邦最高法院对外国法的态度[J];华东政法大学学报;2012年02期
8 苏惠祥,郑成良;略论借鉴和引进外国经济民事法律问题[J];社会科学;1991年04期
9 杨晓强;;浅谈中国对外国法及法学的移植[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年06期
10 谢怀 ;把外国法研究工作推向前进[J];外国法译评;1996年01期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 杨联华;;日本移植外国法的历史经验[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——法的移植与法的本土化[C];2000年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 李祥俊 唐军 徐美芬;涉外合同纠纷的法律适用[N];人民法院报;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王晓锋;英国比较法纵论[D];华东政法学院;2004年
,本文编号:2358053
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2358053.html