英国议会主权的思想史演变

发布时间：2018-12-15 02:12

【摘要】：英国宪法学叙事中的"普通法范式"影响深远,但不能完整概括英国宪制的核心特征。以"议会主权"为代表性原则的"一元民主制"是英国宪制的核心特征,是英国宪制闻名于世的基础性支撑。主张"司法至上"的柯克传统并非英国宪法学的唯一传统,近代以来的英国数代法学家一直致力于一种"议会主权"学术与制度传统的经验描述与规范论证。布莱克斯通体现了普通法学者的政治成熟,提出了英国宪法中"议会主权"的原则性要素。白芝浩和戴雪在英国成熟宪法实践的基础上完成了英国宪法的"学术法典化",奠立了"议会主权"的宪法理论框架。二十世纪以来的詹宁斯、格里菲思、汤姆金斯等人则分别从功能主义和共和规范主义的进路推进"议会主权"的理论完善,并在当代英国宪法改革论辩中独树一帜。英国议会主权的思想演变对于支撑英国当代宪法学中的"政治宪法"传统具有核心理论意义,同时也构成深度理解英国当代宪法变革结构性争议及其走向的必要理论基础。
[Abstract]:The "common law paradigm" in British constitutional narration has a profound influence, but it cannot fully generalize the core features of the British constitution. The principle of "parliamentary sovereignty" as the representative principle is the core feature of the British constitution and the basic support of the British constitutional system. Kirk's tradition of "judicial supremacy" is not the only tradition of British constitutional law. Since modern times, British jurists have been devoted to an empirical description and normative argumentation of the academic and institutional tradition of "parliamentary sovereignty". Blackstone embodies the political maturity of common law scholars and puts forward the principle of parliamentary sovereignty in the British Constitution. Bai Zhihao and Dai Xue completed the "academic codification" of the British constitution on the basis of the mature constitutional practice of Britain, and laid down the constitutional theoretical framework of "parliamentary sovereignty". Since the 20th century, Jennings, Griffith, Tomkins and others have pushed forward the theory of "parliamentary sovereignty" from functionalism and Republican normalism respectively, and are unique in the debate on constitutional reform in contemporary Britain. The ideological evolution of British parliamentary sovereignty has the core theoretical significance for supporting the tradition of "political Constitution" in the contemporary British constitutional jurisprudence, and also constitutes the necessary theoretical basis for a deep understanding of the structural disputes and the trend of the contemporary constitutional reform in Britain.
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学法学院/人文与社会科学高等研究院;
【分类号】：D909.1

【参考文献】