当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

论古代保辜制度对现代“刑事和解”的启示

发布时间:2019-01-05 09:21
【摘要】:在我国古代的刑法制度上,保辜制度是重要的一项法律制度,这一制度的目的在于对于在人身伤害的案件中受害人的合法权益进行保护,对加害人所受应承受的法律责任进行追究,对于社会关系进行整合的制度。在我国古代社会中这一制度实行了两千多年。保辜制度发展的成熟期是在唐代,在此时这一制度得到了系统化和定型化的发展。在宋代、元代、明代和清代保辜制度获得了继续发展,在司法和立法等相关领域也出现了一些变化。该制度本身有其规律性,并且其思想渊源深刻。所谓刑事和解指的是对于原有的案件通过双方相互协商并且合作的方式来对其进行解决和恢复,通常是在刑事诉讼案中,被害人和加害人双方之间主要是通过赔偿、道歉和认罪等方式来解决矛盾、修复关系,从而实现和解,但是国家司法机关并不对加害人进行相关刑事的追责。从20世纪70年代,西方国家就已经确立、完善刑事和解,促进案件的加害人对于被害人进行赔偿、抚慰,改造和教育加害人,发挥司法资源的最大化利用。本文主要针对中国古代保辜制度内涵,发展成因进行详细分析的基础上,结合现代刑事和解制度及实践状况,分析了古代保辜制度对现代“刑事和解”的启示。
[Abstract]:In the criminal law system of ancient China, the system of protecting Koo is an important legal system. The purpose of this system is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the victims in cases of personal injury. Investigate the legal responsibility of the perpetrator and integrate the social relationship. This system has been practiced for more than two thousand years in the ancient society of our country. The mature period of the system was in the Tang Dynasty, at which time, the system was systematized and formalized. In the Song Dynasty, Yuan Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty, the system of protecting Koo was continued to develop, and there were some changes in related fields such as judicature and legislation. The system itself has its own regularity, and its ideological origin is profound. The so-called criminal reconciliation refers to the settlement and restoration of the original cases through mutual consultation and cooperation between the two sides. Usually, in criminal proceedings, the victims and the perpetrators mainly through compensation. Apologies and confessions are used to resolve conflicts, repair relationships, and achieve reconciliation, but the national judicial authorities do not pursue the perpetrators of related criminal liability. Since the 1970s, the western countries have established and perfected the criminal reconciliation, and promoted the victimizer to compensate, comfort, reform and educate the victim to maximize the use of judicial resources. Based on the detailed analysis of the connotation and causes of the development of the system of protection of the Koo in ancient China, combined with the system of modern criminal reconciliation and its practical situation, this paper analyzes the enlightenment of the system of protecting and protecting the Koo in ancient China to the modern "reconciliation of criminal justice".
【学位授予单位】:对外经济贸易大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D929

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 程晓璐;;附条件不起诉制度的适用[J];国家检察官学院学报;2013年06期

2 陈兴良;;刑法教义学与刑事政策的关系:从李斯特鸿沟到罗克辛贯通 中国语境下的展开[J];中外法学;2013年05期

3 武强;张富兴;史辉;;刑事公诉案件和解程序之略考[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2013年03期

4 孙大明;;古代保辜制度与当今人身伤害鉴定[J];中南大学学报(社会科学版);2013年04期

5 谢军;;现代迁移过程中保辜制度的损害赔偿责任研究[J];安徽行政学院学报;2013年01期

6 谢军;;论保辜制度的“被害救助”功能之现代迁移[J];时代法学;2013年01期

7 郭梨影;;新刑诉下检察机关适用刑事和解的思考[J];法制与社会;2013年05期

8 侯继虎;;古代保辜制度对现代法治的启示[J];沧桑;2012年06期

9 黄太云;;刑事诉讼法修改释义[J];人民检察;2012年08期

10 李中和;;从曲元衡杖杀柏公成之母案看唐代保辜制度[J];贵州大学学报(社会科学版);2011年03期



本文编号:2401570

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2401570.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6b0ea***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com