同治时期《申报》刊载法律资料研究
[Abstract]:Before the 19th century, China inherited the ancient traditional legal system, which was different from the western legal system because of the differences of times and regions. However, this tradition changed in the late Qing Dynasty, and the ancient Chinese legal system suffered the fate of disintegration. The reasons for this result are diverse. In addition, the reform of the late Qing Dynasty is an important event in the history of Chinese law. Its influence still exists today. A thorough understanding of the process of reform in the late Qing Dynasty is an important subject in the study of the history of Chinese law. Declaration is one of the earliest newspapers published in China, which was published on April 30, 1872 (on March 23, 2001). By May 27, 1949, when Shanghai was liberated, the publication was suspended, about 25,000. The Declaration is a first-hand information on China's modern history. It contains rich information, covering social, economic, legal, and political aspects. At the present stage, the research results of Chinese legal history in the late Qing Dynasty were mainly concentrated after 1895, and the study of Tongzhi period was less. Neglecting every detail makes us misread and deviate from the real process. Due to the limitation of time and individual ability, this paper tries to analyze the relevant legal system and judicial practice in the period of Tongzhi, taking the legal data collected in the same period of administration as the object of study and analysis. The influence of the western legal culture on the Chinese society, the change of the people's legal concept in the society and their status and function in the whole reform process. This article is divided into four parts, the first part of the introduction, mainly introduces the reason of the topic, research status, main content, research methods and innovation; The second part is to make a brief introduction to the historical background of the production of "declaration" and the specific contents of the relevant legal materials published in "declaration" during the period of Tongzhi. The third part is to analyze and study the legal data of the period of "declaration", and try to analyze the legal system of the relevant judicial practice level of that time and the dissemination of the western legal culture from the perspective of the history of law. In the fourth part, based on the analysis of the legal data in the period of Tongzhi, it reveals the influence and effect of the western legal culture on the society at that time, and explains the position and function of the period of Tongzhi in the late Qing Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G219.29;D929
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩嘉兴;;论清代刑法中的天理观[J];南阳理工学院学报;2017年01期
2 苏青;;清末女性犯罪行为研究——以《申报》报道为例[J];内蒙古电大学刊;2016年04期
3 孙慧;;1889年《申报》影戏广告研究[J];电影新作;2016年03期
4 李婷;;《申报》汉口版广告研究[J];淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版);2016年04期
5 赵战花;来向武;;《申报》研究学术史略(1962~2015)[J];青年记者;2016年10期
6 郭亮亮;;论早期《申报》中的传奇式新闻[J];关东学刊;2016年03期
7 刘俊冉;;《申报》广告中视觉语言的运用[J];读书文摘;2016年02期
8 于飞虎;;清朝秋审朝审制度的主要功能——原情定罪[J];法制与社会;2015年23期
9 陶晶晶;;浅析沈家本的刑法思想[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年07期
10 傅德华;石心怡;;《申报》与寒山寺名人资料的整理与浅析[J];中国索引;2014年01期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 刘育梅;晚清对外贸易法律制度的演变与透视[D];中国政法大学;2009年
2 蔡永明;清末司法改革的社会考察[D];厦门大学;2007年
3 洪佳期;上海公共租界会审公廨研究[D];华东政法学院;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 张欣;舆论、传统与司法—近代法律变革下的“施剑翘案”[D];苏州大学;2016年
2 黄毛毛;上海公共租界领事公堂研究[D];华东政法大学;2014年
3 李峰;昆曲与《申报》研究[D];苏州大学;2012年
4 谢会敏;上海公共租界会审公廨研究[D];山东大学;2009年
5 赵玉环;沈家本法律思想研究[D];山东大学;2008年
6 娜仁娜;清末《申报》舆论的社会影响[D];内蒙古大学;2009年
7 毛莹;清末中国关税法律制度与法律思想初探[D];中国政法大学;2005年
8 张朝晖;沈家本“会通”思想述评[D];东北师范大学;2004年
,本文编号:2416827
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2416827.html