服务于法史学的自然法——19世纪末法史学在法国的形成

发布时间：2019-06-12 04:10

【摘要】：19世纪末的法国法学界同时见证了两项学术史的重要改变:自然法学迎来了复兴,法史学也成了法学院的一门重要学科。两种学术倾向同时在此时发展并非偶然。面对"社会科学批判"和"社会批判"的法学亟需一种可以处理社会发展经验的研究方法。史学的研究范式恰好因为对变化和发展性的强调而得以满足此种要求。而且法史学又因为其研究的是过去的法律,所以符合法学作为规范科学的特性。法史学展现的法律发展性促使一种强调内容可变性的自然法理论得以发展。自然法学家也通过对法史学论据的使用为多元主义的法律渊源理论背书,并强调在多种法律渊源之间进行选择和解释需要以自然法为指导。但他们所主张的自然法并非独立于特定的意识形态倾向。此时的自然法内核是个人主义和自由主义,它恰恰形成了对社会科学批判和社会学批判的回应。
[Abstract]:At the end of the 19th century, the French legal circles also witnessed two important changes in academic history: natural law ushered in a revival, and legal historiography became an important subject of law school. It is no accident that the two academic tendencies develop at this time at the same time. In the face of "social science criticism" and "social criticism", there is an urgent need for a research method that can deal with the experience of social development. The research paradigm of historiography happens to meet this requirement because of the emphasis on change and development. Moreover, legal historiography is in line with the characteristics of law as a normative science because it studies the law of the past. The legal development of legal historiography promotes the development of a natural law theory which emphasizes the variability of content. Natural jurists also endorse the theory of pluralistic sources of law by using the arguments of legal historiography, and emphasize that the choice and interpretation of various sources of law need to be guided by natural law. But the natural law they advocate is not independent of specific ideological tendencies. At this time, the core of natural law is individualism and liberalism, which just forms a response to social science criticism and sociological criticism.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学比较法学研究院;
【基金】：中国政法大学青年科研项目“法国判例功能研究”(项目号16ZFQ82007)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D909;D956.1

【相似文献】