我国实现能动司法的法律思考

发布时间：2018-01-22 06:06

本文关键词： 能动司法司法克制司法能动主义司法独立实现路径　出处：《内蒙古大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,能动司法越来越受到法律实务界的推崇,同时也成为理论界探讨的热点之一。司法能动不仅要求法官在司法裁判中秉承一定的法律价值,创造性的适用法律,理性的对案件的事实问题和法律问题作出判断,同时还要要求法院负担起“为大局服务,为人民司法”的政治功能。本文立足于探究如何在保证司法的独立、安全的前提之下,使司法者,能够积极地弥补法律缺陷、提高司法效率,并实现司法公平、树立积极主动和司法为民的理念。本文分为包括引言在内的的五个部分,第一部分是对能动司法内涵的界定,从能动司法的概念、目的、功能等角度,将我国的能动司法与西方的司法能动主义进行区分,以阐释我国能动司法作为社会主义特色的司法理念所具有的特征。第二部分是对能动司法理念的历史沿革和理论基础的探究,主要包括大陆法系和英美法系司法能动主义的发展历程,并以美国的司法能动为例,剖析能动司法在一定的社会条件下所存在的正当性基础。第三部分是对我国能动司法能够得以实现的可能性进行分析,这部分主要是介绍能动司法得以在我国贯彻实施所需要的制度、体制方面的条件,以及我国法律体系中能动司法的制度预设。第四部分是对能动司法实现的制度层面的设想,主要是探索从立案、审判、和执行等程序中能动司法如何贯彻实施。本文的创新之处在于,在比较分析英美法系中司法能动主义与我国司法能动的共性和个性的基础之上,探究能动司法在中国的法律体制下实现的条件,并从我国司法体制的角度分析制度的完善对与能动司法的实现所具有的意义。
[Abstract]:In recent years, active justice is more and more respected by the legal practice, but also become one of the hot topics in the theoretical circle. Judicial initiative not only requires judges to uphold a certain legal value in the judicial decision. Creatively apply the law, rationally judge the factual and legal issues of the case, and at the same time require the court to bear the burden of "serving the overall situation." Based on the political function of the people's judicature, this paper explores how to ensure the independence and security of the judiciary so that the judiciary can actively make up for the defects of the law, improve the judicial efficiency, and realize judicial fairness. This article is divided into five parts, including introduction, the first part is the definition of active judicial connotation, from the concept of active justice, purpose, function and so on. Distinguish the active judicature in our country from the judicial activism in the west. The second part is to explore the historical evolution and theoretical basis of the active judicial concept. Mainly includes the civil law system and the common law system judicial activism development process, and takes the American judicial initiative as an example. The third part is to analyze the possibility that active justice can be realized in our country. This part mainly introduces the system and institutional conditions that the active justice can carry out in our country. And the system presupposition of active justice in the legal system of our country. 4th part is the assumption of the system level of the active judicial realization, mainly explores from the case filing, the trial. The innovation of this paper lies in the comparative analysis of the commonness and individuality between judicial activism and judicial initiative in Anglo-American law system. This paper probes into the conditions for the realization of active justice under the Chinese legal system, and analyzes the significance of the perfection of the system to the realization of the active justice from the angle of our country's judicial system.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】