论媒体监督与司法公正的冲突与协调

发布时间：2018-01-23 00:24

本文关键词： 媒体监督司法公正协调机制　出处：《山西大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法公正是社会公正的重要内涵之一,在法治理念日渐深入的今天,司法公正问题越来越受到社会大众的关注,采取何种方式监督司法公正也成了司法工作中的重要课题。与传统的司法机关内部监督相比,新兴的媒体监督有其不具备的优越性：媒体监督的主体具有广泛性,方式具有灵活性,对象具有针对性。正因如此,媒体监督作为一种外部的监督方式,可以将其监督功能最大程度地落到实处,是保障司法公正不可或缺的监督方式。然而在实践中,有些媒体片面报道、不实报道、肆意煽动,甚至出现媒体腐败现象,不仅无益于监督司法公正,也给司法机关造成巨大压力,甚至出现干预司法,形成“媒体审判”现象。因此,有必要构建媒体监督与司法公正的协调机制,使二者之间形成良性互动。国内学者对媒体监督与司法公正的关系也颇有研究,但多数研究没有对媒体监督与舆论监督加以区分,以至于在研究中时有混淆。对此,笔者将研究对象限定在媒体监督上,运用实证分析法、个案分析法、比较分析法等研究方法,对媒体监督和司法公正之间的关系进行分析,并提出构建二者之间协调机制的建议。本文开篇即提出媒体监督与司法公正的典型案例,通过案例引出媒体监督与司法公正关系的问题并进行了深入的分析。一方面,从媒体监督对司法公正具有积极意义,二者具有内在契合性,得出媒体监督必须得到坚持和加强；另一方面,通过分析媒体监督对司法公正的消极影响,也就是对媒体监督与司法公正冲突的表现和原因进行分析,得出必须对媒体监督有所规制。提出了构建媒体监督与司法公正协调机制的建议：一方面,既要保障媒体监督权利,又要对媒体监督做出一定规制；另一方面,既要要求司法机关宽容媒体监督,又要要求司法机关敢于拒绝媒体的不当干涉。
[Abstract]:Judicial justice is one of the important connotations of social justice. With the deepening of the concept of the rule of law today, the issue of judicial justice is more and more concerned by the public. How to supervise judicial justice has also become an important issue in judicial work, compared with the traditional internal supervision of judicial organs. The emerging media supervision has its own advantages: the main body of the media supervision is extensive, the way has the flexibility, the object has the pertinence. For this reason, the media supervision is a kind of external supervision way. The supervision function can be put into practice to the maximum extent, and it is an indispensable way to ensure judicial justice. However, in practice, some media report one-sided, false reports, wanton incitement. Even the phenomenon of media corruption not only does not benefit the supervision of judicial justice, but also causes great pressure on the judicial organs, and even interferes with the administration of justice and forms the phenomenon of "media trial". It is necessary to construct the coordination mechanism between media supervision and judicial justice so as to form a positive interaction between them. Domestic scholars have also studied the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice, but most of the studies do not distinguish between media supervision and public opinion supervision, so there is confusion in the research. The author limits the research object to media supervision, using empirical analysis, case analysis, comparative analysis and other research methods to analyze the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. And put forward the suggestion of constructing the coordination mechanism between the two. At the beginning of this paper, a typical case of media supervision and judicial justice is put forward, through which the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice is brought forward and analyzed deeply. On the one hand. From the positive significance of media supervision to judicial justice and the inherent agreement between the two, it is concluded that media supervision must be adhered to and strengthened. On the other hand, through the analysis of the negative impact of media supervision on judicial justice, that is, the performance and reasons of the conflict between media supervision and judicial justice are analyzed. Some suggestions are put forward to construct the coordination mechanism between media supervision and judicial justice: on the one hand, we should not only protect the right of media supervision, but also regulate the media supervision; On the other hand, we should not only ask the judiciary to tolerate media supervision, but also to refuse media interference.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】