和谐理念与诉讼问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-12 13:43

本文关键词： 法院调解非诉讼纠纷解决机制民间调解行政诉讼调解　出处：《太原科技大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：“和谐”社会是人类自古以来孜孜以求的一种理想状态,也是我国社会悠久而珍贵的思想传统和价值追求,其中包含了我们祖先思考人生、社会、自然乃至宇宙的最高智慧,“和谐”理念作为构建和谐社会的首要指导思想,在文化的传承中,在思想的扬弃中,不可避免的对现代社会的司法诉讼及解决纠纷的方式都产生了深刻的影响。因此,在崇尚“以和为贵”的中国社会下,在儒家思想的影响以及对“无讼”价值的追求下,最有代表性的“调解”成为我国纠纷解决机制中最深入民心,影响最大的化解纠纷的方式。随着现代社会经济的高速发展,传统社会下单一的解决纠纷的方式明显不能满足需要,这使我们有必要建立一个多元化的纠纷解决体系,无论在审判中还是审判外,任何有利于解决纠纷和矛盾的方式我们都应该发扬和借鉴。本文的第一章,在我国的民事诉讼中,首先对法院调解进行了论述。司法诉讼作为法院调解的前身,已被实践了数千年。虽然运行中还存在各种问题,但这并非诉讼调解制度内在构造上的矛盾,而是缺乏规范化、制度化的程序设计,通过制度的完善是可以避免的。正是诉讼的纠纷解决方式越来越显示其负面的作用,如程序的复杂化、高成本化、解决纠纷的不彻底性,第二章非诉讼纠纷解决机制(ADR)开始更多地为世人所关注。第三章民间调解作为非诉讼纠纷解决机制的重要方式之一,其产生、发展有深刻的历史和文化渊源。我国的民间调解制度作为一项悠久的法律传统,逐渐发展为具有我国特色的纠纷解决方式。但是,民间调解的作用在当今乡土社会中还没有完全凸现出来,甚至被描述为“法盲行为”,因此,我们不仅要为民间调解“正名”,更要通过论述构建我国民间调解的框架。本文的第四章,在我国的行政诉讼中,选取了行政诉讼调解这一问题作为研究的主题。虽然我国的行政诉讼中禁止运用调解方式解决行政案件(行政赔偿诉讼除外),但在司法实践中,行政案件的变相调解屡见不鲜,这导致行政案件的低立案率和高撤诉率,面对这种矛盾的现状,对于在行政诉讼中到底应否引入调解制度,我国学术界众说纷纭。该章通过比较研究法、文献分析法和法社会学等方法对我国行政诉讼应当引入调解制度进行了深入剖析,以寻求行政诉讼调解的理论支撑。最后,笔者建议改革我国行政诉讼法,构建和完善我国行政诉讼程序的调解制度,同时在实践中不断地更新与完善我国行政诉讼的调解制度,为其发展不断注入新的活力。
[Abstract]:"Harmony" is an ideal state of human society since ancient times is also our society diligently strive after the long and precious ideological tradition and value pursuit, including our ancestors to think about life, society, nature and even the highest wisdom of the universe, "harmony" concept as the main guiding ideology of building a harmonious society, in the cultural heritage in the thought, sublation, will have a profound impact on the judicial proceedings in modern society and the inevitable way to resolve disputes. Therefore, in advocating "harmony" in the Chinese society under the influence of Confucian thought of "no litigation" pursuit of value, the most representative "mediation" has become China's dispute settlement mechanism is the most thorough popular sentiment, the greatest impact way to settle disputes.
With the rapid development of modern society, the traditional social single way of solving disputes obviously can not meet the need, which makes it necessary to establish a diversified dispute settlement system, either in court or not, any good way of solving disputes we should develop and utilize the first chapter of this article. And in Chinese civil litigation, the court mediation are discussed. The judicial proceedings as the predecessor of court mediation has been practiced for thousands of years. Although there are various problems in the operation, but this is not the contradiction of the lawsuit mediation system, but the lack of standardized procedures, system design, through the the perfection of the system can be avoided. It is the way to solve the dispute litigation increasingly show its negative effects, such as complicated procedure, high cost, not completely solve disputes, second Non litigation dispute resolution mechanism (ADR) became more and more concerned. One of the important ways of the third chapter of civil mediation as a non litigation dispute resolution mechanism in its development, with profound history and cultural origin. China's civil mediation system as a long legal tradition, has gradually developed into me the characteristics of the way to resolve disputes. However, the role of civil mediation is not fully apparent in today's rural society, may be described as the "legal act", therefore, we must not only for civil mediation, "name" framework to construct our country's civil mediation through discussion. In the fourth chapter, in China's administrative litigation, administrative litigation mediation chooses this topic as the research theme. While prohibiting the use of mediation to resolve administrative cases in China's administrative proceedings (except administrative compensation litigation, but in judicial) In practice, in the mediation of administrative cases which lead to administrative cases It is often seen., low filing rate and high withdrawal rate, in the face of the situation, in the administrative litigation mediation system should be introduced in the end, Public opinions are divergent. the academic circle of our country. This chapter through the comparative research method, literature analysis method and sociology methods should be introduced the mediation system has carried on the thorough analysis of administrative litigation of our country, in order to find the theory basis of administrative litigation mediation. Finally, the author suggests that the reform of the administrative procedure law of our country, construct and perfect our country's Administrative Litigation system, and constantly update and improve our administrative litigation mediation system in practice, new the vitality of injection for its development.

【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925;D926

【相似文献】