知识产权“三审合一”审判制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-06 19:34

本文选题：知识产权　切入点：三审合一制度　出处：《湘潭大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：知识产权“三审合一”制度,是指将知识产权案件统一交由知识产权庭进行管辖,不再根据现有诉讼法的规定和法院内部机构职能由不同的审判庭进行审理的制度。传统的“三审分立”制度在知识产权审判实践中存在着很多弊端,各国根据知识产权的特点结合自己的国情创建了符合自己情况的知识产权审判模式,这些模式的相同之处就是知识产权“三审合一”:在日本有知识产权高等法院,在德国有德国联邦专利法院,在英国亦有知识产权专业法院。根据理论和实践的分析,在现有四种知识产权审判机构模式中,笔者认为设立知识产权庭更加符合我国国情。虽然设立知识产权法院的审判模式也具有很多优点,但由于我国的法院体制改革涉及很多理论和现实的问题,建立知识产权法院的审判模式要对我国的宪法和诉讼法等法律做出大幅度的修改,涉及面太宽。在我国《国家知识产权战略纲要》中已经提到了设立“知识产权庭”的政策,而且我国已经存在了大量的试点可以提供实践经验。在知识产权庭的试点确定了知识产权“三审合一”制度的模式后,知识产权庭内部制度的构建以及程序的衔接还存在一些问题。在文章中,笔者首先阐述了我国知识产权审判的现状,即对知识产权审判实践中“三审分立”制度的应用存在的弊端做了具体分析;其次,分析了与知识产权“三审分立”制度相对应的知识产权“三审合一制度”在理论层面上的可行性。最后,对国内外的“三审合一”制度的模式进行了分析比较,为我国的知识产权“三审合一”模式的建立提供参考。在国内外实践成功的基础上和有利的理论基础上,笔者提出建议:实行知识产权审判“三审合一”制度,建立知识产权庭,统一知识产权庭的名称,将知识产权庭从民三庭中划分出来,建立正式的知识产权庭。并根据国内外的经验和我国的实际情况,对知识产权庭内部具体制度如何设置提出一些建议,包括:涉及知识产权问题的三种类型的案件的审判程序如何衔接,知识产权中技术事实查明制度的设置,行政机关的授权、行政确权在诉讼中的设置,从而实现知识产权“三审合一”的合理建构。
[Abstract]:The "triple trial" system of intellectual property rights refers to the system in which intellectual property rights cases are handed over to the intellectual property court under the jurisdiction of the intellectual property court and are no longer tried by different divisions according to the provisions of the existing procedural law and the functions of the internal organs of the court. The traditional system of "separation of third instance" has many drawbacks in the practice of intellectual property trial. According to the characteristics of intellectual property rights, countries have created a trial mode of intellectual property rights according to their own conditions. What these models have in common is the "triple trial" of intellectual property: the High Court of intellectual property in Japan, the German Federal Patent Court in Germany, and the specialized Court of intellectual property in the United Kingdom. Among the four existing modes of intellectual property judicial institutions, the author thinks that the establishment of intellectual property courts is more in line with the national conditions of our country. Although the trial mode of setting up intellectual property courts also has many advantages, However, since the reform of the court system in our country involves many theoretical and practical issues, the establishment of the trial mode of the intellectual property court should substantially modify the laws of our country, such as the constitution and the procedural law. The scope is too wide. The policy of setting up an "intellectual property court" has already been mentioned in the National intellectual property Strategic outline of China. Moreover, there are already a large number of pilot projects in China that can provide practical experience. After the trial of the intellectual property Tribunal has determined the model of the "triple trial" system of intellectual property rights, There are still some problems in the construction of the internal system of intellectual property court and the connection of procedure. In this paper, the author first expounds the current situation of intellectual property trial in China, that is, the disadvantages of the application of the system of "separation of third instance" in the practice of intellectual property trial are analyzed concretely. This paper analyzes the theoretical feasibility of the system of "triple trial in one" of intellectual property, which corresponds to the system of separation of third instance of intellectual property. Finally, it analyzes and compares the mode of "three trials in one" at home and abroad. This paper provides a reference for the establishment of the mode of "triple trial" of intellectual property rights in our country. On the basis of the successful practice at home and abroad and the favorable theoretical basis, the author puts forward some suggestions: to implement the system of "triple trial" of intellectual property rights. Establishing an intellectual property court, unifying the name of the intellectual property court, dividing the intellectual property court from the three chambers of the people, establishing a formal intellectual property court, and according to the domestic and foreign experience and the actual situation in our country, Some suggestions on how to set up a specific system within the intellectual property court are put forward, including: how to link up the trial procedures of the three types of cases involving intellectual property issues, the setting up of a system for ascertaining technical facts in intellectual property rights, and the authorization of administrative organs, The establishment of administrative confirmation right in litigation, so as to realize the rational construction of intellectual property rights.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2;D923.4

【参考文献】