论司法产品的性质与供给——一个经济分析的视角

发布时间：2018-03-07 03:10

  本文选题：司法产品　切入点：公共物品　出处：《北方法学》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：司法产品并不必然就是公共物品,司法服务也非必须由政府提供。历史上,政府司法首先是作为统治者的创收手段发展起来的,而非公共服务。市场或社区自身也能够提供非政府的纠纷解决机制。政府司法并不天然优于非政府司法。对于大量不具有公共物品属性的案件,非政府司法能够提供更有效率的服务。当事人的选择自由和竞争机制是非政府司法有效运作的关键。这一机制适用于公共法院,也就是当事人合意选择公共法官制度。后者可能对我国当下的司法改革具有特殊的政策意义。
[Abstract]:Judicial products are not necessarily public goods, and judicial services do not have to be provided by the government. Historically, government justice has developed first as a means of generating income for rulers. And non-public services. The market or the community itself can also provide non-governmental dispute resolution mechanisms. Government justice is not naturally superior to non-governmental justice. For a large number of cases that do not have the attributes of public goods, The ability of non-governmental justice to provide more efficient services... the parties' freedom of choice and competition mechanisms are key to the effective functioning of non-governmental justice... this mechanism applies to public courts, The latter may have special policy significance to the current judicial reform in our country.
【作者单位】： 山东大学(威海)法学院;
【基金】：山东省哲学社会科学规划项目“经济分析方法在司法中的应用研究”(项目编号13DFXJ04)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926
，

本文编号：1577671