我国法院强制拍卖制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-11 15:24

  本文选题：强制拍卖　切入点：制度　出处：《郑州大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：进入20世纪以来,随着社会的深度变革和人们法律诉求的增加,法院的民事强制执行行为越来越多,而法院强制拍卖是民事执行行为中的一项重要程序,拍卖制度作为国际上通行的一种竞价方式,具有公开、公平、公正的特征,符合市场经济发展的趋势,而坚持和完善强制拍卖制度,可以实现对采取强制措施的物品变现价格的最高,通过这种形式,即可以达到实现债权,保护债权人合法权益的目的,同事通过强制拍卖的手段,又注重了效率和效益,减轻了债务人的负担。 在司法实践中,诸多债务纠纷经判决后得不到有效的执行,既损害了债权人的合法权益,又影响了法律的权威性,通过强制拍卖,可以使大量的被执行财产实现其经济价值,在这一实现经济价值的过程中,充分依赖和体现法院强制拍卖的公信力性质。 法院强制拍卖的法律基础并非《拍卖法》,其渊源来自于民事诉讼法,因此其性质、效力以及具体程序上与任意拍卖有诸多不同,强制拍卖行为是基于公权力的公正性、权威性、公信力的。因此,法院强制拍卖制度要能够发挥应有作用,必须具有公信力。其公信力除了体现在由法院主持拍卖,合理平衡各方当事人的利益外,还体现在必须充分保障法院强制拍卖的稳定性,减少因此引发的各种纠纷。 本文从法学原理上对法院强制拍卖进行探讨和考察分析,通过对强制拍卖和任意拍卖的性质进行比较研究,从而阐明其相对于一般拍卖所独具的特征及其独具的法律关系主体。强制拍卖不同于一般拍卖,它不仅包含有公共利益与私人利益间的互相冲突,如委托方执行法院与拍卖各参与主体间的冲突,又有参与主体间的相互冲突。本文从强制拍卖的理论基础着手,对整个拍卖过程中的各种利益关系进行分析比对,旨在从程序制订和制度设计层面探讨和解决各种冲突,从而在制度设计上作出相应的调整。
[Abstract]:Since 20th century, with the deep change of the society and the increase of people's legal demands, the civil enforcement actions of the court are more and more, and the court compulsory auction is an important procedure in the civil execution behavior. The auction system, as a common bidding method in the world, has the characteristics of openness, fairness and justice, and conforms to the trend of the development of the market economy, while insisting on and perfecting the compulsory auction system, It is possible to achieve the highest realized price for goods that take coercive measures. In this form, the purpose of realizing claims and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of creditors can be achieved, and colleagues pay attention to efficiency and effectiveness by means of compulsory auction. The burden on the debtor was lightened. In judicial practice, many debt disputes can not be executed effectively after judgment, which not only damages the legitimate rights and interests of creditors, but also affects the authority of the law. Through forced auction, a large number of executed property can realize its economic value. In the process of realizing economic value, it fully depends on and embodies the credibility of the court compulsory auction. The legal basis of compulsory auction in court is not auction law, and its origin comes from the civil procedure law. Therefore, its nature, validity and concrete procedure are different from those of arbitrary auction. The act of compulsory auction is based on the fairness of public power. Therefore, in order to play its due role, the compulsory auction system of the court must have credibility. The credibility of the auction is not only reflected in the auction conducted by the court, but also in a reasonable balance between the interests of the parties concerned. It also shows that the stability of court compulsory auction must be fully guaranteed and the disputes caused by it should be reduced. Based on the principle of law, this paper makes an investigation and analysis on the compulsory auction of the court, and makes a comparative study of the nature of the compulsory auction and the arbitrary auction. Therefore, it clarifies its unique characteristics relative to general auction and its unique subject of legal relations. Compulsory auction is different from general auction. It contains not only the conflict between public and private interests, but also the conflict between public and private interests. Such as the conflicts between the parties involved in the execution of the court and the auction, and the conflicts among the participants. This paper analyzes and compares all kinds of interest relations in the whole auction process from the theoretical basis of the compulsory auction. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and resolve various conflicts from the aspect of procedure making and system design, so as to make corresponding adjustments in system design.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2;D922.294

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 肖建国;论民事诉讼中强制拍卖的性质和效力[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期

2 吴星奎;;强制拍卖船舶中各方当事人法律关系分析[J];重庆文理学院学报(社会科学版);2006年06期

3 王晓明;;执行拍卖程序中的权利救济研究[J];法治研究;2007年11期

4 樊惠平;法院强制执行拍卖制度的理论基础[J];河北法学;2004年09期

5 许卫武;;试谈法院强制拍卖的法律性质[J];黄石教育学院学报;2005年03期

6 宋汉林;;论民事强制执行拍卖程序的完善[J];江苏广播电视大学学报;2009年01期

7 朱道华;;论法院强制拍卖制度[J];嘉应学院学报;2006年01期

8 潘光晔;;论强制拍卖的性质[J];科教文汇(上旬刊);2008年01期

9 黄宣;张杰;;论民事公诉制度的法理基础[J];宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版);2010年02期

10 张国明;;论执行拍卖合同的非民事可诉性[J];人民司法;2006年05期

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前2条

1 韦炜;执行拍卖相关法律问题研究[D];苏州大学;2005年

2 张艳丽;立法后评估的程序设计[D];山东大学;2008年

，

本文编号：1598759