构建我国网络民意与司法的良性互动机制研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 19:24

本文选题：司法　切入点：网络民意　出处：《新疆大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：网络作为民意表达的一种新的场域,源自于现代信息技术的发展和以民意表达机制不畅的双重需求和机遇,在此基础上,网络民意的监督也逐渐侵蚀到司法活动的界域。学者们对司法和网络民意的关系从不同的角度进行了解读,众说纷纭。笔者在仔细梳理了学者们的不同观点后,通过对网络民意与司法关系现状的阐述,分析了二者产生冲突的原因,试图构建网络民意与司法的良性互动机制。本文分为三个部分,主要有以下几个方面内容：首先阐述民意、网络民意的涵义、功能及特征与司法的概念,二者互动关系的理想模式,为后文的论述作铺垫。然后阐述了网络民意与司法在我国的关系现状,对司法活动产生的影响。之后进一步探索两者冲突的原因,如：网络暴力的存在、网络民意理性的缺失、网络自由使得信息过剩和信息异化；司法信赖危机的加剧；网络民意与司法活动的角色差异。最后一部分提出了网络民意与司法良性互动的路径,机制的构建和具体的实施措施。只有在两者之间寻求适度的平衡,找到最佳的契合点,才能实现两者的良性互动,进而推动民主法治的进程。
[Abstract]:As a new field of public opinion expression, the network derives from the dual demand and opportunity of the development of modern information technology and the poor expression mechanism of public opinion. The supervision of network public opinion also gradually erodes the boundary of judicial activities. Scholars interpret the relationship between justice and network public opinion from different angles and have different opinions. After carefully combing the different viewpoints of scholars, By expounding the current situation of the relationship between network public opinion and judicature, this paper analyzes the causes of the conflict between them, and tries to construct a benign interactive mechanism between network public opinion and judicature. This paper is divided into three parts, mainly as follows: first of all, it expounds the public opinion, the meaning, function and characteristics of network public opinion and the concept of judicature, and the ideal model of the interaction between the two. Then it expounds the current situation of the relationship between the network public opinion and the judicature in our country, and the influence on the judicial activities. Then it further explores the causes of the two conflicts, such as the existence of the network violence, the lack of the rationality of the network public opinion. Network freedom makes information surplus and information dissimilation; the crisis of judicial trust intensifies; the role difference between network public opinion and judicial activity. The last part puts forward the path of benign interaction between network public opinion and judicature. Only by seeking a proper balance between the two and finding the best fit point can the benign interaction between the two be realized and the process of democracy and rule by law be promoted.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】