能动司法的歧义性问题分析

发布时间：2018-03-13 20:06

本文选题：司法政策　切入点：能动司法　出处：《法商研究》2012年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：司法作为现代社会生活的基础之一,其许多关系同时存在着对立性和共生性,因此我们应当在多种视界下的理论架构里对司法问题进行分析。就当下广受关注的能动司法而言,如果我们在分析时仅仅固守某一种理论立场,那么从形式逻辑上看就会产生歧义性问题。但是从公共政策学上看,司法政策的政治属性又决定了能动司法的歧义性问题的存在。人们围绕能动司法所展开的无论是涉及专业化或混合职能的司法权属之间的争辩,还是关于能动司法所致力于实现的实体正义或程序正义的基本价值的争论,抑或是就裁判公正或政治正确的司法可行性问题的讨论,无不显示出能动司法的歧义性问题。正视并最终解决这种歧义性问题,需要我们立足于当代我国的宪政生活本身不断地进行实践创新和理论探索。
[Abstract]:Justice as one of the basis of modern social life, many of its relations exist contradiction and symbiosis, so we should be in a variety of theoretical framework under the vision of justice. In the analysis of judicial activism on the current popular, if we just stick to a certain position in the theoretical analysis, then from the form a logical point of view will produce ambiguity. But from the public policy perspective, the political attribute of judicial policy determines the ambiguity of judicial activism exists. People around the judicial activism launched either professional or mixed to the judicial functions of the ownership of the basic value or argue about judicial activism is committed to realize the substantive justice or procedural justice debate or discussion justice or politically correct judicial feasibility problem, all show activejudicial To solve this ambiguity problem, we need to base ourselves on the contemporary constitutional life in China, and constantly carry out practical innovation and theoretical exploration.

【作者单位】：南京理工大学知识产权学院;南京大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金资助项目(11CFX054)
【分类号】：D926

【共引文献】