论能动司法的限度

发布时间：2018-03-17 16:12

本文选题：能动司法　切入点：限度　出处：《暨南大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：能动司法对于转型时期的中国具有重要的社会和政治意义,反映着中国转型时期对正义的诉求和期盼。但由于能动司法并非完美无瑕,其在我国司法实践中仍然存在诸多问题,比如政策与法律错位、能动司法在调解中的滥用、法官自由裁量权膨胀等。因此,规范能动司法、确定能动司法之限度,杜绝司法之盲动显得尤为必要。对能动司法应采取多限制种措施,正确处理政策与法律的关系,确保法律优先适用；规范法官审判行为,使法官自由裁量权合理行使；强化检察机关之检察监督职能,赋予检察机关启动违宪审查权和明确司法弹劾制度。从宏观、微观等各个方面确定能动司法之限度,克服能动司法之弊端,保障能动司法之功效得到最大程度的发挥。
[Abstract]:Active justice has important social and political significance for China in the transitional period, which reflects the demand and expectation for justice in the transitional period of China. However, as the active justice is not perfect, there are still many problems in the judicial practice of our country. For example, the dislocation of policy and law, the abuse of active justice in mediation, the expansion of judges' discretion and so on. It is particularly necessary to put an end to the blindness of judicature. We should take many restrictive measures to the active judicature, correctly handle the relation between policy and law, ensure that the law is applied first, standardize the judge's trial behavior, and make the judge exercise his discretion reasonably. Strengthen the procuratorial supervisory function of the procuratorial organ, endow the procuratorial organ with the power to initiate the review of unconstitutionality and clarify the judicial impeachment system, determine the limits of the active judicature from various aspects, such as macro and micro, etc, and overcome the malpractice of the active judicature. To ensure the effectiveness of active justice to maximize play.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】