法庭论辩中的诉诸权威及其评估

发布时间：2018-03-21 03:11

  本文选题：诉诸权威　切入点：具有专门知识的人　出处：《东岳论丛》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：诉诸权威的论证作为一种发生于对话情境中的可废止性的论证型式,应经受一系列批判性问题的检验。法庭论辩中的各方主体需针对不同的场合对该论证提出不同的批判性问题,并在批判与回应的对话剖面中检验诉诸权威论证的真实性与可靠性,使主观的怀疑接受客观层次的审视与检省,并从中识别出与专家意见制约条件不符合的例外情形予以排除或反驳,以形成心证或内心确信。
[Abstract]:The argument of resorting to authority as a form of argumentative annulment that occurs in the context of dialogue, Should be tested by a series of critical questions. The parties in the court debate have to put forward different critical questions to the argument on different occasions, And in the dialogue section of criticism and response to verify the authenticity and reliability of the appeal to authority argument, so that subjective doubt to accept the objective level of examination and inspection of the province, The exception which does not accord with the restriction condition of expert opinion is excluded or refuted to form psychological evidence or inner conviction.
【作者单位】： 华东交通大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“法律论证逻辑研究——面向‘法治中国’建设的整合性和应用性研究”(15AZX019)
【分类号】：D926.2
，

本文编号：1641997