我国法官职能的定位与重塑

发布时间：2018-03-21 19:37

本文选题：法官调解　切入点：巡回审判　出处：《广东商学院》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：法官作为司法审判者,其所发挥的作用不仅仅是解决纠纷,法官还承担实现社会正义、维护社会秩序、树立司法权威并促进国家法治建设的重任。法官的职能本应是进行司法审判,自从我国提倡调解结案促进社会和谐以来,法官又担任起了司法调解的工作,并且在实践中出现了“重调解轻审判”的情况,这对传统的法官审判职能造成了冲击,调审合一模式下法官调解与审判界限模糊也对司法的效率和公正带来了负面影响。调解与审判作为纠纷解决模式有着各自的优势,但两者毕竟有着不同的运作风格,有时甚至是相互冲突的,这种情况下有必要将两者分开。对法官调解进行必要限制,将大量的调解工作从审判过程中分离出去,不仅可以充分发挥调解的本土资源优势,还可以保证法官司法审判职能的专一性,实现和谐社会建设和法治建设的双赢。
[Abstract]:Judges, as judicial judges, not only play a role in resolving disputes, but also undertake to realize social justice and maintain social order. Establishing judicial authority and promoting the construction of the country's rule of law. The function of judges should be to conduct judicial trials. Since our country advocated mediation to promote social harmony, the judges have also served as judicial mediators. Moreover, in practice, the situation of "attaching importance to mediation over trial" has caused an impact on the traditional judge's judicial functions. The blur of the boundary between mediation and trial also has a negative impact on the efficiency and justice of justice. Mediation and trial have their own advantages as dispute resolution mode, but they have different operation styles. Sometimes even in conflict with each other, it is necessary to separate the two from each other... By restricting the mediation of judges and separating a large amount of mediation from the trial process, it is not only possible to give full play to the advantages of local resources in mediation, It can also guarantee the specificity of the judge's judicial function and realize the win-win situation in the construction of a harmonious society and the construction of the rule of law.
【学位授予单位】：广东商学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】