我国量刑规范化现状评析及完善思路

发布时间：2018-03-21 23:04

本文选题：量刑规范化　切入点：量刑偏差　出处：《甘肃政法学院》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：定罪和量刑是刑事司法制度中最为核心的两个问题,而长期以来,由于受到“重定罪轻量刑”思维定势的影响,量刑问题似乎不再是一个“问题”。但事实上并非如此,纵观我国的刑事审判实践,量刑偏差的情况屡见不鲜。究其根本,就是我们的量刑活动远远没有达到规范化的要求。因此,对量刑活动进行规范化改革成为我们纠正量刑偏差、实现罪刑均衡、量刑公正的必然选择。所以,“到底何为量刑规范化、量刑到底如何规范化?”也就成了我们必须要面对和解决的两大课题。对“到底何为量刑规范化”的正确理解,是我们进行量刑规范化改革的逻辑前提,认识偏颇则可能导致整个改革进程的异化；对“量刑到底如何规范化”的全面认识,是我们实现量刑规范化改革目标的基本手段,缺此一笔则量刑规范化改革如同“空中楼阁”无从实现。本文将从以下四个方面对上述问题进行探讨。第一部分,量刑规范化概说。主要对量刑规范化的价值内涵及意义进行论证,目的在于纠正当前量刑规范化改革进程中对量刑规范化本体的一些错误认识。第二部分,主要从量刑方法、量刑权等方面分析了可能对我国的量刑规范化改革产生影响的一些关键因素。第三部分,为国外量刑体制的考察及对我国的启示。由于国外的量刑规范化改革起步较早,积累了很多值得我们借鉴的宝贵经验。因此,对国外量刑体制的考量,对我国深入开展量刑规范化改革也是大有裨益的。第四部分,为本文的重点章节,主要是针对前三个部分对我国量刑规范化改革现状的剖析,提出一些实现量刑规范化的具体措施,以期对刑事司法审判实践有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Conviction and sentencing are the two most important issues in the criminal justice system, and for a long time, due to the influence of the "heavy conviction over sentencing" mentality, sentencing seems to be no longer a "problem." but in fact, this is not the case. Throughout our country's criminal trial practice, the situation of sentencing deviation is common. The root of it is that our sentencing activities are far from reaching the requirements of standardization. Therefore, the standardized reform of sentencing activities has become our correction of sentencing deviations. To realize the balance of crime and punishment, the inevitable choice of sentencing justice. So, "what exactly is sentencing standardization, how to standardize sentencing?" The correct understanding of "what is the standardization of sentencing" is the logical premise of our reform of sentencing standardization, and the understanding of bias may lead to the alienation of the whole reform process; A comprehensive understanding of "how to standardize sentencing" is the basic means for us to achieve the goal of standardized sentencing reform. Without this, the reform of sentencing standardization can not be realized as "pavilion in the air". This article will discuss the above problems from the following four aspects. The first part, introduction of sentencing standardization, mainly demonstrates the value connotation and significance of sentencing standardization, the purpose of which is to correct some mistakes in the process of sentencing standardization reform. Mainly from the sentencing methods, sentencing power and other aspects of the analysis of the possible impact on our country's sentencing standardization reform some key factors. Part three, For the investigation of foreign sentencing system and the enlightenment to our country. As the reform of sentencing standardization started earlier abroad, it has accumulated many valuable experiences that we should learn from. Therefore, the consideration of foreign sentencing system, It is also beneficial to carry out the reform of sentencing standardization in depth in our country. The fourth part, which is the key chapter of this article, is mainly aimed at the analysis of the current situation of the reform of sentencing standardization in our country in the first three parts. Some concrete measures to realize the standardization of sentencing are put forward in order to benefit the practice of criminal justice.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D924;D926.2

【参考文献】