我国能动司法的内涵探究
发布时间:2018-03-26 09:06
本文选题:司法 切入点:能动 出处:《陕西师范大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:2009年8月,最高人民法院院长、首席大法官王胜俊同志就当前人民法院应如何更好地服务经济社会发展需要、更好地发挥司法的职能和作用等问题到江苏等地进行调研时,提出能动司法这一概念,期望人民法院能对当前转型变革情形下复杂多变的社会状况作出积极回应。此后,各级法院将能动司法作为司法实践的重要指导,积极探索尝试能动司法的实现形式。这在一定程度上对化解社会矛盾纠纷,切实保障群众权益,维护社会公平正义,促进经济社会健康发展起到了积极作用。同时,法学理论界也开始关注最高人民法院关于能动司法的各种指导性意见,积极深入实践研究典型,思考和比较中国语境下的能动司法与西方司法能动主义的关联性,形成丰富而具有实践指导意义的科研成果。 目前,司法实务界在尚未充分明确和理解能动司法的内涵情况下,已开始根据当地实际情况探索能动司法的实现路径,为大家所熟知的模式有:姜堰模式、陇县模式、东营模式、河南模式等;法学理论界的探讨研究则多集中在能动司法的实现条件和路径、注意事项、能动司法与西方司法能动的比较、能动司法与司法克制的关系等等。有的学者对能动司法持积极态度;有的学者对能动司法表示极力反对;亦有学者对能动司法持温和态度,既在某种程度上表示肯定,又对实践中存在的部分观点和模式有所担忧。学者对能动司法如此种种不同态度,在某种程度上源自对能动司法内涵认识的不足和不统一。已有的研究成果少有深入探究能动司法基于当前中国司法环境所具有的内涵,因此,明确能动司法的内涵,既是统一并规范司法实务界和法学理论界认识的根本,又是能动司法实践积极探索的理论依据,也是进一步深入研究能动司法的理论基础。 以探究能动司法的内涵为核心,本文主要分四部分展开论述。 第一部分是文章的第一章。这一部分主要对与能动司法相关的概念范围进行界定。首先,对“司法”的概念进行历史性回顾,明确本文中谈到的司法的涵义,司法的主体是人民法院;其次,对“能动”的概念进行界定;最后,在不考虑能动司法和司法能动特定的内涵和实践的情况下,对“司法”与“能动”的词语组合搭配,即:“能动司法”与“司法能动”进行语义分析,考察两者的语义相关性。 第二部分是文章的第二章。这一部分首先对美国的司法能动的基本内涵进行界定,明确司法能动是以司法审查和宪法的关系为中心而展开;在此基础上,以司法审查为线索,运用历史的方法回顾美国司法能动的产生、发展过程,并将司法能动的发展分为三个阶段论述;其次,对美国司法能动的历史进行分析,以期明确美国司法能动所具有的特征;最后,论述美国司法能动对于我国能动司法的启示。 第三部分是文章的第三章和第四章。首先从我国的基本国情、金融危机的影响、转型时期、法制现状、司法现状五个方面对我国复杂的司法环境进行分析,进而推导出社会对司法的期待,说明能动司法的必要性;根据我国现有的法律法规分析我国人民法院在国家权力架构中的权力分配和地位。其次,根据中国能动司法所处的环境,并在评析司法实务界和法学理论界对能动司法的不同认识的基础上,明确能动司法的中国内涵具有两个方面的意义,即作为一种司法政策的能动司法和作为一种司法裁判方法的能动司法;最后,依据能动司法的内涵理论推导出当前能动司法的实践内涵。 第四部分是文章的第五章,也是文章的结论部分。总结全文,并再次强调能动司法内涵明确的意义,期待着研究者的争议能够明晰中国司法改革的路径。
[Abstract]:In August 2009, the president of the Supreme People's court, the chief justice of Comrade Wang Shengjun of the people's court should be how to better serve the needs of economic and social development, better play the function and role of judicial problems to Jiangsu for research, put forward the concept of judicial activism, the people's court can expect on the current reform situation complex the social status of positive response. Since then, the courts take judicial activism as judicial practice guidance, and actively explore the implementation form of judicial activism. This to a certain extent to resolve social conflicts and disputes, safeguard the rights and interests of the people, safeguard social fairness and justice, promote the healthy development of the economy and society has played a positive role. At the same time, the law the theory also began to pay attention to the Supreme People's Court on judicial activism of guidance, positive development practice on typical thinking, and Comparing the relationship between the active judicature and the western judicial activism in the Chinese context, the scientific research achievements with practical guiding significance are formed.
At present, in the judicial practice is not yet fully clear and understanding the connotation of judicial activism case, has begun to explore the path to achieve according to the actual situation of the local judicial activism, well known model are: Jiangyan mode, Longxian mode, Dongying mode, Henan mode; research on theory of law is more focused on implementation the condition and path of judicial activism, attention, comparison of judicial activism and the western judicial activism, the relationship between judicial activism and judicial restraint and so on. Some scholars hold a positive attitude towards judicial activism; some scholars said strongly opposed of activejudicial; some scholars hold moderate attitude to judicial activism, not only to a certain extent affirmed and, on the part of ideas and models in practice concerns. Scholars of judicial activism in such a variety of different attitudes, from the understanding of the connotation of judicial activism in some extent Insufficient and not unified. The existing research results are less in-depth study of judicial activism in current judicial environment China has based on the connotation, therefore, clear the connotation of the judicial activism, the fundamental is to unify and standardize the judicial practice and legal theory knowledge, is the theoretical basis of judicial activism and actively explore the practice, but also the theoretical basis for further in-depth study of the judicial activism.
In order to explore the connotation of active justice as the core, this article is mainly divided into four parts.
The first part is the first chapter of the article. This part of the main range of the related concepts about judicial activism was defined. First, to review the history of the concept of justice ", this paper talked about judicial meaning, the judicial body is the people's court; secondly, the concept of" energy "; finally, without considering the judicial activism and judicial activism specific connotation and practice under the condition of" justice "and" active "word combination collocation, namely:" Judicial Activism "and" Judicial Activism "semantic analysis, semantic relevance between them.
The second part is the second chapter. This part firstly the basic connotation of judicial activism in the United States are clearly defined, judicial activism is the relationship between judicial review and the constitution centered; on this basis, the judicial review as a clue, using the method of history review of American judicial activism, and development process. The development of judicial activism is divided into three chapters; secondly, on the history of American judicial activism is analyzed, with the characteristics of clear American judicial activism has; finally, discusses the judicial activism for China's judicial activism of the enlightenment.
The third part is the third chapter and the fourth chapter. First, from the basic situation of our country, the influence of the financial crisis, the transition period, legal status, analysis of China's complex judicial environment five aspects of judicial status, and then derive the social expectations of the judiciary and the necessity to move according to my justice; existing laws and regulations, analysis of China's people's court in the national power structure and the distribution of power and status. Secondly, according to the Chinese of judicial activism in the environment, and in the judicial practice and legal theory of judicial activism in different understanding on the basis of clear judicial activism has two aspects of the connotation of China meaning, as a judicial policy of judicial activism and judicial adjudication as a method of judicial activism; finally, according to the connotation of judicial activism is derived from the theory of the current practice of judicial activism in the culvert.
The fourth part is the fifth chapter of the article, and also the conclusion of the article. Summarize the full text, and emphasize the significance of the connotation of active justice again, and look forward to the controversy of researchers to clarify the path of China's judicial reform.
【学位授予单位】:陕西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926
,
本文编号:1667236
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1667236.html